Marketing14 min readSourced Data

SaaS Marketing Statistics 2026: CAC, Retention, Trials

Sourced SaaS marketing statistics for 2026: CAC payback, NRR and churn, trial conversion, sales and marketing spend, and how B2B buyers use AI search.

Digital Applied Team
April 21, 2026• Updated October 21, 2026
14 min read
16 months

Median B2B SaaS CAC payback, 2025 (Benchmarkit, 198 companies)

102%

Median B2B SaaS net revenue retention, 2025 (Benchmarkit, 230 companies)

8%

Median free-to-paid conversion, 200 software products, Jan 2026 (ChartMogul)

51%

B2B software buyers who start research in an AI chatbot more often than Google, Mar 2026 (G2)

Key Takeaways

Acquisition got more efficient in 2025: Benchmarkit’s survey of B2B SaaS companies found median CAC payback of 16 months in 2025, down from 18, and $1.63 of sales and marketing per $1 of new-customer ARR, down from $2.00. The median Magic Number rose from 0.94 to 1.37.
Retention weakened: Median gross revenue retention fell from 88% to 84%, while net revenue retention edged up from 101% to 102%. Product-led companies kept a median 79% of revenue gross, against 89% for sales-led companies (Benchmarkit, 2025 data; the report’s text says 88%).
Free-to-paid conversion depends on the model: ChartMogul’s January 2026 survey of 200 products found a median 8% of signups paying within six months, and 30% for trials that require a credit card, more than five times trials without one.
Pricing model shows up in NRR: Usage-based-only SaaS companies had a median NRR of 108% in 2025, against 98% for seat-based ones. Only 29% of SaaS companies with AI features charge for them separately (Benchmarkit).
Buyers now start in AI chatbots: In G2’s March 2026 survey, 51% of B2B software buyers start research with an AI chatbot more often than with Google, and AI chatbots were the most cited shortlist influence (54%). Gartner found 67% of B2B buyers prefer a rep-free experience.
Nine listed SaaS companies spent 17% to 52% of revenue on sales and marketing: Calculated from their 10-K filings, the range ran from Twilio (17.2%) to Asana (51.5%), with HubSpot at 44.1%; Benchmarkit’s survey median was 35% in 2025.

SaaS marketing statistics are only useful when you know who was measured and how. A median from a survey of private B2B companies, a rate from one billing platform’s customers and a figure from a public company’s 10-K describe different populations, and the most quoted SaaS numbers often credit reports that do not publish them. This page collects the figures that can be traced to a publisher’s own report, with the sample, measure and period in every row.

The main sources are Benchmarkit’s 2026 survey of 342 B2B SaaS and AI-native companies (calendar 2025 results), ChartMogul’s reports from its billing data and from a January 2026 survey of 200 software products, High Alpha’s and KeyBanc Capital Markets and Sapphire Ventures’ 2025 surveys, ICONIQ’s 2025 go-to-market report, G2’s and Gartner’s buyer surveys, Gartner’s forecasts and the SEC filings of eleven listed SaaS companies. Figures were checked on October 21, 2026.

For the acquisition side in more depth, see our CAC benchmarks; for help turning these benchmarks into a content and pipeline plan, see our content engine service.

SaaS Market Size and Growth

Software spending is still growing at double-digit rates. Gartner’s October 2026 forecast puts worldwide software spending at $1.46 trillion in 2026, up 15.2% against 14.5% for all IT spending. Its last worldwide public cloud forecast, from November 2024, expected spending on SaaS to reach $299.1 billion in 2025, the largest segment of the public cloud market. These are forecasts rather than measured sales, and they cover all software, not only the subscription companies the rest of this page describes.

Growth at individual SaaS companies tells a different story. Benchmarkit’s 2026 survey found median ARR growth of 20% in calendar 2025, down every year from 30% in 2022. The 2025 KeyBanc Capital Markets and Sapphire Ventures survey projected a rebound to 20% from 15% in 2024. ChartMogul’s billing data shows how quickly growth fades: among 700+ private software companies that grew at least 20% in 2024, the median company kept 43% of its growth rate, so a company growing at the median 65% in 2024 grew 28% in 2025, and only 18% held or improved their growth rate.

FigureWhat it measuresSource
$1.46 trillionWorldwide software spending forecast for 2026, up 15.2% on 2025 ($1,464 billion; Gartner forecast, October 2026 update)Gartner, Oct 21, 2026Forecast
$1.25 trillionWorldwide software spending in 2025, up 11.5% on 2024 ($1,249.5 billion), as estimated in Gartner’s February 2026 forecastGartner, Feb 3, 2026Estimate (research firm)
$299.1 billionWorldwide end-user spending on software as a service (SaaS) forecast for 2025, up 19.2% from $250.8 billion in 2024; SaaS was the largest segment of a $723.4 billion public cloud market (Gartner forecast, November 2024)Gartner, Nov 19, 2024Forecast
20%Median year-on-year ARR growth of B2B SaaS and AI-native companies in calendar 2025, down from 26% in 2024, 27% in 2023 and 30% in 2022 (338 companies; middle half 8% to 42%)Benchmarkit 2026, Jun 1, 2026Survey
20%Projected 2025 ARR growth of private SaaS companies in the 2025 KeyBanc Capital Markets and Sapphire Ventures survey, up from 15% in 2024 and described as the first rebound in three yearsKeyBanc/Sapphire, 2025 edition, read Oct 21, 2026Forecast
40%Year-on-year ARR growth of companies with $1 million to $5 million ARR whose products use AI as a supporting feature, against 110% for companies with AI at the core of the product (High Alpha 2025 SaaS Benchmarks survey, 800+ respondents; growth to Q2 2025)High Alpha, Dec 12, 2025Survey
16%Year-on-year ARR growth of companies above $50 million ARR whose products use AI as a supporting feature, against 38% for companies with AI at the core of the product (High Alpha 2025 SaaS Benchmarks survey)High Alpha, Dec 12, 2025Survey
43%Median growth endurance (this year’s growth rate divided by last year’s) of 700+ private software companies on ChartMogul that grew at least 20% in 2024; at that rate, a company growing at the dataset’s median 65% in 2024 grew 28% in 2025ChartMogul, Apr 15, 2026Benchmark (platform data)
18%Share of 700+ private software companies on ChartMogul (each growing at least 20% in 2024) that maintained or improved their growth rate from 2024 to 2025ChartMogul, Apr 15, 2026Benchmark (platform data)
1 in 10Software startups that reach $10 million ARR within 10 years of first monetizing, in ChartMogul’s data on 6,525 software companies; almost half reach $1 million and 1 in 50 reach $25 millionChartMogul, Oct 15, 2025Benchmark (platform data)
3.3%Share of software startups in ChartMogul’s data (6,525 companies) that reached $1 million ARR within 12 months of first monetizing; 13.4% got there within three years and 25.1% within fiveChartMogul, Oct 15, 2025Benchmark (platform data)
93%Top-quartile year-on-year ARR growth of companies with $25 million to $100 million ARR in 2025 to date, up from 78% in 2023 (ICONIQ State of Go-to-Market 2025)ICONIQ, 2025 edition, read Oct 21, 2026Survey

AI-native companies are the exception. In High Alpha’s 2025 survey, companies with $1 million to $5 million ARR whose products have AI at the core grew 110% year on year, against 40% for those using AI as a supporting feature, and the gap held above $50 million ARR (38% against 16%). Reaching scale is still rare: in ChartMogul’s data on 6,525 software companies, 1 in 10 reach $10 million ARR within ten years of first monetizing.

CAC and Payback Benchmarks

Benchmarkit’s survey reports acquisition efficiency several ways, each with its sample size. In calendar 2025 the median B2B SaaS company needed 16 months of gross margin to recover what it spent winning customers, down from 18 months in 2024, and spent $1.63 in sales and marketing for each $1 of new-customer ARR, down from $2.00. The median Magic Number rose to 1.37, above 1.0 for the first time in the survey’s four-year series. Benchmarkit attributes the gain mainly to lower sales, marketing and R&D spending rather than to faster growth.

Contract size moves payback most: 11 months below $5,000 ACV against 22 months at $50,000 to $100,000. Fast growers were also the most efficient, with a 10-month median for companies growing more than 50% a year. For the wider set of acquisition-cost figures, including paid-media cost per lead and the CAC that public companies report, see our CAC benchmarks.

FigureWhat it measuresSource
16 monthsMedian CAC payback of B2B SaaS companies in calendar 2025: months of gross margin from new-customer ARR needed to recover sales and marketing spend (198 companies; middle half 10 to 24 months); 18 months in 2024 and 14 in 2023Benchmarkit 2026, Jun 1, 2026Survey
11 monthsMedian CAC payback of SaaS companies selling below $5,000 annual contract value (ACV), calendar 2025 (middle half 10 to 17 months)Benchmarkit 2026, Jun 1, 2026Survey
22 monthsMedian CAC payback of SaaS companies selling at $50,000 to $100,000 ACV, calendar 2025, the longest of the ACV bands (middle half 15 to 27 months)Benchmarkit 2026, Jun 1, 2026Survey
10 monthsMedian CAC payback of SaaS companies growing more than 50% a year, calendar 2025, against 18 months for companies growing 11% to 20%Benchmarkit 2026, Jun 1, 2026Survey
$1.63Median sales and marketing spend per $1 of new-customer ARR (new-customer CAC ratio), B2B SaaS, calendar 2025 (128 companies; middle half $1.14 to $2.22), down from $2.00 in 2024Benchmarkit 2026, Jun 1, 2026Survey
$1.30Median sales and marketing spend per $1 of new plus expansion ARR (blended CAC ratio), B2B SaaS, calendar 2025 (122 companies; middle half $1.08 to $1.78), down from $1.40 in 2024Benchmarkit 2026, Jun 1, 2026Survey
$0.80Median sales, marketing and customer success spend on expansion per $1 of expansion ARR from existing customers (expansion CAC ratio), B2B SaaS, calendar 2025 (74 companies), down from $1.00 in 2024Benchmarkit 2026, Jun 1, 2026Survey
1.37Median SaaS Magic Number (quarterly revenue growth relative to the previous quarter’s sales and marketing spend) of B2B SaaS companies, calendar 2025 (132 companies; middle half 0.68 to 2.14), up from 0.94 in 2024 and 0.90 in 2023 and above 1.0 for the first time in the survey’s four-year seriesBenchmarkit 2026, Jun 1, 2026Survey
4.1xMedian ratio of customer lifetime value to CAC (CLTV:CAC), B2B SaaS, calendar 2025 (146 companies; top quartile 7.8x), up from 3.6x to 3.7x in 2022 to 2024Benchmarkit 2026, Jun 1, 2026Survey
34 monthsMedian CAC payback of 77 public SaaS companies in calendar 2024, calculated on net new ARR (middle half 27 to 52 months), against 18 months for 148 private respondents calculated on new-customer ARRBenchmarkit 2025, May 2025Survey
71%Median growth rate of companies in High Alpha’s 2025 SaaS Benchmarks survey with net revenue retention above 106% and CAC payback under 10 months (median Rule of 40: 47%); companies with NRR below 98% and payback over 15 months grew a median 10% (Rule of 40: 5%)High Alpha, 2025 edition, read Oct 21, 2026Survey

Payback definitions differ. Private companies usually divide spend by new-customer ARR, while public companies usually use net new ARR after churn, and Benchmarkit warns that the two are not comparable: 77 public SaaS companies showed a 34-month median in its 2025 edition against 18 months for private respondents. High Alpha’s 2025 survey shows why payback and retention belong together: companies with net revenue retention above 106% and payback under 10 months grew a median 71%, against 10% for those with retention below 98% and payback over 15 months.

Trial-to-Paid and Free-to-Paid Conversion

Trial and freemium conversion is where SaaS marketing and product meet, and the most quoted figures rarely say what they measure. ChartMogul’s Conversion Report, built on a January 2026 survey of 200 B2B software products run with ProductLed, defines free-to-paid conversion as the share of leads or free signups that become paying customers within six months. On that definition the median was 8%.

The entry model matters more than any single benchmark. Free trials were the most common entry point (57% of products, against 26% for freemium), most often lasting 14 days. Trials that ask for a credit card converted 30% of signups, more than five times trials without one, but they attract fewer signups. Per 1,000 website visitors, the survey’s averages give 10.5 paying customers for card-required trials against 5 for freemium and 3.6 for free trials.

FigureWhat it measuresSource
8%Median free-to-paid conversion across 200 B2B software products, defined as leads or free signups that became paying customers within six months (ChartMogul and ProductLed survey of 200 B2B software products, January 2026; typical respondent $1 million to $10 million ARR)ChartMogul, Feb 4, 2026Survey
57%Share of 200 surveyed software products whose primary entry point for new customers is a free trial; 26% use freemium, 7% a reverse trial, 7% an interactive demo and 4% a paid trial (ChartMogul and ProductLed survey of 200 B2B software products, January 2026)ChartMogul, Feb 4, 2026Survey
14 daysMost common free-trial length among 200 surveyed software products, used by 62% of them; 7-day and 30-day trials 14% each (ChartMogul and ProductLed survey of 200 B2B software products, January 2026)ChartMogul, Feb 4, 2026Survey
20%Share of free-trial software products that require a credit card upfront (ChartMogul and ProductLed survey of 200 B2B software products, January 2026)ChartMogul, Feb 4, 2026Survey
30%Free-to-paid conversion of free trials that require a credit card, more than five times that of trials without one (ChartMogul and ProductLed survey of 200 B2B software products, January 2026)ChartMogul, Feb 4, 2026Survey
4–6%‘Good’ free-to-paid conversion for software products that lead with a free trial (‘great’: 10–15%), from the ranges in the ChartMogul report (ChartMogul and ProductLed survey of 200 B2B software products, January 2026)ChartMogul, Feb 4, 2026Survey
3–5%‘Good’ free-to-paid conversion for freemium self-serve products (‘great’: 8–12%); for ungated freemium that works without an account, ‘good’ is 7–9% (ChartMogul and ProductLed survey of 200 B2B software products, January 2026)ChartMogul, Feb 4, 2026Survey
25–35%‘Good’ free-to-paid conversion for free trials that require a credit card (‘great’: 50–60%) (ChartMogul and ProductLed survey of 200 B2B software products, January 2026)ChartMogul, Feb 4, 2026Survey
10.5Paying customers per 1,000 website visitors for credit-card-required trials, against 5.6 for ungated freemium, 5 for freemium and 3.6 for free trials, combining each model’s signup and free-to-paid rates (ChartMogul and ProductLed survey of 200 B2B software products, January 2026)ChartMogul, Feb 4, 2026Survey
43%Share of 200 surveyed software products that improved free-to-paid conversion over the previous 12 months; one in ten improved it by 25% or more (ChartMogul and ProductLed survey, January 2026, reported in part 2)ChartMogul, Mar 18, 2026Survey
80%Share of free-trial software products with human touchpoints when an enterprise user enters the trial (ChartMogul and ProductLed survey of 200 B2B software products, January 2026)ChartMogul, Feb 4, 2026Survey
2.5%Median 7-day trial-to-paid conversion of B2B SaaS companies on ChartMogul, against 16% for B2C; conversions cluster around day 7 (platform data, Q1 2024 to Q1 2025)ChartMogul, Jun 11, 2025Benchmark (platform data)
56%Average conversion from free trial or proof of concept at AI-native companies with $100 million+ ARR, against 32% for other companies (ICONIQ State of Go-to-Market 2025)ICONIQ, 2025 edition, read Oct 21, 2026Survey

Platform data shows how short the window is. In ChartMogul’s billing data, B2B trial conversions cluster around day 7, with a median 2.5% converting in the first week. Larger buyers rarely go fully self-serve: 80% of free-trial products in the survey bring in people when an enterprise user arrives, and ICONIQ reports 56% conversion from free trial or proof of concept at AI-native companies above $100 million ARR, against 32% for others.

Churn, GRR and NRR Benchmarks

Retention weakened in 2025. Benchmarkit’s median gross revenue retention, the share of recurring revenue kept after churn and downgrades, fell from 88% to 84%, the largest drop in its four-year series, and the top quartile fell from 95% to 91%. Median net revenue retention, which adds expansion, edged up to 102%. Smaller contracts churn more: companies selling below $5,000 a year kept a median 80% of revenue, against 91% at $50,000 to $100,000.

Go-to-market motion shows up in retention too. Product-led companies kept a median 79% and hybrid companies 80%, against 89% for sales-led companies (Benchmarkit’s chart; its text says 88%). KeyBanc Capital Markets and Sapphire Ventures describe gross retention near 90% and net retention above 100% in their 2025 survey.

FigureWhat it measuresSource
84%Median gross revenue retention (GRR: recurring revenue kept after churn and downgrades, before expansion) of B2B SaaS companies, calendar 2025, down from 88% in 2024 (226 companies; middle half 76% to 91%, against 81% to 95% in 2024)Benchmarkit 2026, Jun 1, 2026Survey
80%Median GRR of SaaS companies selling below $5,000 ACV, calendar 2025 (middle half 74% to 85%)Benchmarkit 2026, Jun 1, 2026Survey
91%Median GRR of SaaS companies selling at $50,000 to $100,000 ACV, calendar 2025, the highest ACV band (middle half 79% to 96%)Benchmarkit 2026, Jun 1, 2026Survey
79%Median GRR of product-led SaaS companies, calendar 2025, against 80% for hybrid product- and sales-led companies and 89% for sales-led companies (the chart shows 89%; the report’s text says 88%)Benchmarkit 2026, Jun 1, 2026Survey
102%Median net revenue retention (NRR: recurring revenue kept from existing customers, including expansion) of B2B SaaS companies, calendar 2025, up from 101% in 2024 (230 companies; middle half 92% to 110%)Benchmarkit 2026, Jun 1, 2026Survey
94%Median NRR of SaaS companies below $5 million ARR, calendar 2025, against 103% for companies above $100 million ARR (75th percentile 115%)Benchmarkit 2026, Jun 1, 2026Survey
92%Median NRR of SaaS companies growing less than 10% a year, calendar 2025, against 111% for companies growing more than 50%Benchmarkit 2026, Jun 1, 2026Survey
~90%Gross retention of private SaaS companies in the 2025 KeyBanc Capital Markets and Sapphire Ventures survey, described as ‘near 90%’, with net retention ‘above 100%’KeyBanc/Sapphire, 2025 edition, read Oct 21, 2026Survey
82%Median NRR of B2B SaaS companies with at least $250,000 ARR on ChartMogul, annualized through 2025 (upper quartile 97%); the B2C SaaS median was 49%ChartMogul, Dec 10, 2025Benchmark (platform data)
40%Median GRR of AI-native companies with at least $250,000 ARR on ChartMogul in September 2025, up from 27% in January 2025 (median NRR 48%)ChartMogul, Dec 10, 2025Benchmark (platform data)
70%GRR of AI-native products priced above $250 a month (NRR 85%), against 23% GRR for AI-native products priced below $50 a month (ChartMogul, 2025)ChartMogul, Dec 10, 2025Benchmark (platform data)
48%Median year-on-year growth of SaaS companies on ChartMogul with NRR of 100% or more in the first half of 2024, about double the growth of companies in lower NRR ranges (2,500+ companies)ChartMogul, Sep 3, 2024Benchmark (platform data)
2.9%Average monthly churn of Zoom’s online (self-serve) customers, measured on recurring revenue, in the three months to July 31, 2026, unchanged from a year earlier; online customers were 38.3% of revenueZoom 10-Q, Aug 26, 2026Official (company-reported)
~8%Salesforce’s attrition rate as of January 31, 2026: the reduction or loss of the annualized value of customer contracts over the trailing 12 months, excluding Slack self-service and that year’s acquisitions; consistent with the prior yearSalesforce 10-K, Mar 2, 2026Official (company-reported)

ChartMogul’s billing data, drawn from the companies on its platform, shows lower retention than Benchmarkit’s survey. Among B2B SaaS companies above $250,000 ARR on ChartMogul, median NRR was 82% in 2025, and AI-native companies kept a median 40% of revenue gross, although AI products priced above $250 a month retained 70%. Retention also predicts growth: in ChartMogul’s data for the first half of 2024, companies with NRR of 100% or more grew a median 48%, about double the rest.

For what these rates mean for customer value, see our customer lifetime value benchmarks.

Net Revenue Retention at Listed SaaS Companies

Listed SaaS companies report net revenue retention in their SEC filings, each on its own definition: some measure annual recurring revenue and some revenue, some use a trailing 12-month average, and Zoom reports only its enterprise customers. The figures are not directly comparable, but they show the range. Platforms that grow with customer usage sit highest, with Snowflake at 126% and MongoDB at 122%, while products sold mainly by licence or seat sit near or below 100%: Zoom’s enterprise customers at 99% and Asana at 97%.

FigureWhat it measuresSource
126%Snowflake’s net revenue retention rate as of July 31, 2026 (125% at January 31, 2026): product revenue in the latest year from customers on capacity contracts who used the platform two years earlier, divided by their revenue in the year beforeSnowflake 10-Q, Sep 4, 2026Official (company-reported)
122%MongoDB’s net ARR expansion rate as of July 31, 2026: ARR from customers a year on, divided by all ARR a year earlier including customers who churnedMongoDB 10-Q, Sep 1, 2026Official (company-reported)
Low 120s%Datadog’s trailing 12-month dollar-based net retention rate as of June 30, 2026, up from about 120% a year earlierDatadog 10-Q, Aug 6, 2026Official (company-reported)
116%Twilio’s dollar-based net expansion rate for the quarter ended June 30, 2026, up from 108% a year earlier, as revenue grew 22%Twilio 10-Q, Aug 7, 2026Official (company-reported)
109%Klaviyo’s dollar-based net revenue retention rate as of June 30, 2026 (108% a year earlier)Klaviyo 10-Q, Aug 5, 2026Official (company-reported)
107%Okta’s dollar-based net retention rate as of July 31, 2026Okta 10-Q, Aug 27, 2026Official (company-reported)
104%Freshworks’ net dollar retention rate as of June 30, 2026, down from 106% a year earlier, a decrease it attributes mainly to exchange ratesFreshworks 10-Q, Aug 4, 2026Official (company-reported)
103.5%HubSpot’s net revenue retention for 2025 (101.8% in 2024), across 288,706 customers paying an average $11,414 a year in subscription revenueHubSpot 10-K, Feb 11, 2026Official (company-reported)
99%Zoom’s trailing 12-month net dollar expansion rate for enterprise customers as of July 31, 2026 (98% a year earlier)Zoom 10-Q, Aug 26, 2026Official (company-reported)
97%Asana’s dollar-based net retention rate as of July 31, 2026 (96% a year earlier; 98% for core customers spending more than $5,000 a year)Asana 10-Q, Sep 3, 2026Official (company-reported)

HubSpot, which sells marketing, sales and service software, reported 103.5% net revenue retention for 2025 across 288,706 customers paying an average $11,414 a year. At the self-serve end, Zoom’s online customers churned 2.9% of recurring revenue a month in the quarter to July 2026, while Salesforce put its attrition, the annualized contract value lost to cancellations and reductions over 12 months, at about 8%.

Expansion Revenue and Pricing

Expansion is now a large share of new revenue. In Benchmarkit’s 2025 data, upsell and cross-sell to existing customers made up a median 40% of total new ARR, rising to 62% above $50 million ARR. Hybrid companies that combine product-led and sales-led motions led at 54%, while product-led companies sat lowest at 36%.

Pricing architecture shows up in NRR. Companies with usage-based-only pricing had a median NRR of 108% in 2025, against 98% for seat-based subscriptions. For AI features, most vendors still bundle: 67% of SaaS companies with AI functionality did not charge for it separately, and among those that did, subscription plus usage was the most common model at 39%.

FigureWhat it measuresSource
40%Median share of total new ARR that came from expansion of existing customers, B2B SaaS, calendar 2025 (114 companies; middle half 29% to 59%), the same as in 2024Benchmarkit 2026, Jun 1, 2026Survey
62%Median expansion share of new ARR for SaaS companies above $50 million ARR (62% at both $50 million to $100 million and above $100 million), calendar 2025; 52% at $20 million to $50 million, 35% at $5 million to $20 million and 39% below $5 millionBenchmarkit 2026, Jun 1, 2026Survey
54%Median expansion share of new ARR for hybrid product- and sales-led SaaS companies, calendar 2025, against 41% for sales-led and 36% for product-led companiesBenchmarkit 2026, Jun 1, 2026Survey
108%Median NRR of SaaS companies with usage-based-only pricing, calendar 2025 (middle half 102% to 155%), against 98% for seat-based subscriptions, 105% for non-seat subscriptions and 102% for subscription plus usageBenchmarkit 2026, Jun 1, 2026Survey
40%Share of growth that came from expansion revenue at SaaS companies with $15 million to $30 million+ ARR on ChartMogul in 2024, up from 30% in early 2021ChartMogul, Sep 3, 2024Benchmark (platform data)
~1 in 3Share of companies using hybrid pricing models, more common among AI-native businesses (ICONIQ State of Go-to-Market 2025)ICONIQ, 2025 edition, read Oct 21, 2026Survey
29%Share of B2B SaaS companies with AI functionality that charge separately for it; 67% do not charge incrementally (156 companies, Benchmarkit 2026 survey)Benchmarkit 2026, Jun 1, 2026Survey
39%Share of SaaS companies charging for AI that use subscription plus usage pricing for it, the most common model, ahead of seat-based subscriptions (26%), non-seat subscriptions (23%) and usage-only pricing (13%) (Benchmarkit 2026 survey)Benchmarkit 2026, Jun 1, 2026Survey
Two-thirdsShare of companies in the 2025 KeyBanc Capital Markets and Sapphire Ventures survey already monetizing AI through subscription or hybrid modelsKeyBanc/Sapphire, 2025 edition, read Oct 21, 2026Survey
0.83%Seat-upgrade rate of new customers in their first month, falling to 0.37% in month two and 0.09% by month 11 (ChartMogul, 10.5 million purchases at 4,029 private software companies, cohorts August 2025 to June 2026)ChartMogul, Sep 30, 2026Benchmark (platform data)
40%Share of first-year plan upgrades that happen in month 12, at annual renewal (ChartMogul, 10.5 million purchases at 4,029 private software companies, cohorts August 2025 to June 2026)ChartMogul, Sep 30, 2026Benchmark (platform data)
5%+Share of cancelled customers who reactivate within three months (2.67% in the first month after cancelling); AI-native products see nearly 10% (ChartMogul, 10.5 million purchases at 4,029 private software companies, cohorts August 2025 to June 2026)ChartMogul, Sep 30, 2026Benchmark (platform data)

Timing matters as much as packaging. In ChartMogul’s data on 10.5 million purchases, new customers added seats at a rate of 0.83% in their first month, falling to 0.09% by month 11, and 40% of first-year plan upgrades came at the annual renewal in month 12.

Sales and Marketing Spend and Channels

The median B2B SaaS company in Benchmarkit’s survey spent 35% of revenue on sales and marketing in 2025, down from 37%, the first decline in the series. Companies growing 31% to 50% spent the most (44%), while those growing faster than 50% spent 35%. Hybrid product- and sales-led companies spent more than sales-led ones (39% against 34%), which Benchmarkit puts down to product-led companies adding sales and account management as they move to larger customers.

The nine listed companies on this page show a wide spread. Calculated from 10-K income statements, sales and marketing ran from 17.2% of revenue at Twilio to 51.5% at Asana in their latest fiscal years, with HubSpot at 44.1% and Salesforce at 34.5%. All nine cut the share year on year, Freshworks most (from 54.2% to 47.1%), and HubSpot went from 46.4% to 44.1%.

FigureWhat it measuresSource
35%Median sales and marketing (S&M) expense as a share of revenue, B2B SaaS companies, calendar 2025, down from 37% in 2024 (196 companies; middle half 25% to 47%)Benchmarkit 2026, Jun 1, 2026Survey
39%Median S&M expense as a share of revenue for hybrid product- and sales-led SaaS companies, calendar 2025, against 34% for sales-led companiesBenchmarkit 2026, Jun 1, 2026Survey
44%Median S&M expense as a share of revenue for SaaS companies growing 31% to 50% a year, calendar 2025, the highest of any growth band; companies growing faster than 50% spent 35%Benchmarkit 2026, Jun 1, 2026Survey
44.1%HubSpot’s sales and marketing expense as a share of revenue in fiscal 2025 ($1,379.4 million of $3,131.3 million), down from 46.4% in 2024 and 49.2% in 2023; calculated from its 10-KHubSpot 10-K, Feb 11, 2026Official (company-reported)
34.5%Salesforce’s sales and marketing expense as a share of revenue in the fiscal year to January 31, 2026 ($14,345 million of $41,525 million), from 35.0% a year earlier; calculated from its 10-KSalesforce 10-K, Mar 2, 2026Official (company-reported)
44.0%Snowflake’s sales and marketing expense as a share of revenue in the fiscal year to January 31, 2026 ($2,062.1 million of $4,683.9 million), from 46.1% a year earlier; calculated from its 10-KSnowflake 10-K, Mar 20, 2026Official (company-reported)
41.0%Klaviyo’s selling and marketing expense as a share of revenue in fiscal 2025 ($506.2 million of $1,234.0 million), from 43.1% in 2024; calculated from its 10-KKlaviyo 10-K, Feb 10, 2026Official (company-reported)
47.1%Freshworks’ sales and marketing expense as a share of revenue in fiscal 2025 ($394.8 million of $838.8 million), from 54.2% in 2024; calculated from its 10-KFreshworks 10-K, Feb 26, 2026Official (company-reported)
51.5%Asana’s sales and marketing expense as a share of revenue in the fiscal year to January 31, 2026 ($407.0 million of $790.8 million), from 58.0% a year earlier; calculated from its 10-KAsana 10-K, Mar 13, 2026Official (company-reported)
27.9%Datadog’s sales and marketing expense as a share of revenue in fiscal 2025 ($956.4 million of $3,427.2 million), from 28.2% in 2024; calculated from its 10-KDatadog 10-K, Feb 18, 2026Official (company-reported)
28.5%Zoom’s sales and marketing expense as a share of revenue in the fiscal year to January 31, 2026 ($1,388.3 million of $4,868.8 million), from 30.6% a year earlier; calculated from its 10-KZoom 10-K, Feb 27, 2026Official (company-reported)
17.2%Twilio’s sales and marketing expense as a share of revenue in fiscal 2025 ($873.2 million of $5,067.2 million), from 19.3% in 2024; calculated from its 10-KTwilio 10-K, Feb 24, 2026Official (company-reported)
7.8%Marketing budgets as a share of company revenue in 2026, up from 7.7% in 2025, across 401 CMOs and other marketing leaders in North America, the UK and Europe in all industries, mostly at companies with over $1 billion revenue (Gartner CMO Spend Survey, January–March 2026)Gartner, May 11, 2026Survey
EventsGo-to-market channel most often named as effective by respondents to High Alpha’s 2025 SaaS Benchmarks survey (800+ respondents), first in four of five ARR bands (45% to 79% of companies); above $50 million ARR, SEO and organic search led (64% against 52% for events)High Alpha, 2025 edition, read Oct 21, 2026Survey

Marketing budgets alone are far smaller. Gartner’s 2026 CMO Spend Survey puts marketing at 7.8% of company revenue across industries, mostly at companies above $1 billion revenue, so it is a cross-industry figure rather than a SaaS benchmark. On channels, respondents to High Alpha’s 2025 survey named events as effective more often than any other channel in every ARR band below $50 million; above that, SEO and organic search led.

For paid-social costs on the main B2B channel, see our LinkedIn Ads benchmarks; for wider B2B data, see our B2B marketing statistics.

How SaaS Buyers Research: AI Search, Reviews and Content

How software buyers find vendors is changing faster than most marketing measurement. In G2’s March 2026 survey of 1,076 B2B decision-makers, 51% said they start software research with an AI chatbot more often than with Google, and 71% use AI chatbots somewhere in the process, although 80% still use Google too. AI chatbots were the most cited influence on vendor shortlists (54%), ahead of software review sites (43%) and vendor websites (36%), and 69% said a chatbot led them to a different vendor than planned. G2 runs a software review site, and its survey also found review-site citations to be the signal buyers trust most in an AI answer (45%).

Buyers also want less contact with sellers. In Gartner’s survey of 646 B2B buyers in August and September 2025, 67% preferred a rep-free buying experience, up from 61% in its previous survey, and 45% had used AI during a recent purchase.

FigureWhat it measuresSource
51%Share of B2B software buyers who start software research with an AI chatbot more often than with Google (G2 survey of 1,076 B2B software decision-makers, March 2026)G2, 2026 edition, read Oct 21, 2026Survey
71%Share of B2B software buyers who rely on AI chatbots somewhere in software research, up from roughly 60% seven months earlier; 80% still use Google somewhere in the journey (G2 survey of 1,076 B2B software decision-makers, March 2026)G2, 2026 edition, read Oct 21, 2026Survey
54%Share of B2B software buyers naming generative AI chatbots as an influence on which vendors make their shortlist, the most cited source; software review sites 43%, vendor websites 36%, vendor salespeople 19% (G2 survey of 1,076 B2B software decision-makers, March 2026)G2, 2026 edition, read Oct 21, 2026Survey
69%Share of B2B software buyers who say an AI chatbot led them to a different vendor than planned in their latest evaluation; 33% chose a vendor they had not considered (G2 survey of 1,076 B2B software decision-makers, March 2026)G2, 2026 edition, read Oct 21, 2026Survey
45%Share of B2B software buyers who say review-site citations are the most confidence-inspiring signal in an AI chatbot’s answer (G2 survey of 1,076 B2B software decision-makers, March 2026)G2, 2026 edition, read Oct 21, 2026Survey
67%Share of B2B buyers who prefer a rep-free buying experience; 45% had used AI during a recent purchase (Gartner survey of 646 B2B buyers, August–September 2025)Gartner, Mar 9, 2026Survey
61%Share of B2B buyers who preferred an overall rep-free buying experience in Gartner’s previous survey (632 buyers, August–September 2024); 73% actively avoid suppliers that send irrelevant outreachGartner, Jun 25, 2025Survey
9 in 10Share of B2B marketers who use AI to create content; fewer than 4 in 10 say it has improved performance (Content Marketing Institute and MarketingProfs survey of 1,000+ B2B marketers, published October 2025)CMI, Oct 8, 2025Survey
45%Share of B2B marketers naming AI-powered marketing tools among their top three areas of increased investment for 2026, against 9% for people: salaries, training and development (CMI and MarketingProfs survey of 1,000+ B2B marketers)CMI, Oct 8, 2025Survey

Content teams use AI heavily but report mixed results. In the Content Marketing Institute and MarketingProfs survey of more than 1,000 B2B marketers for 2026, 9 in 10 use AI to create content, but fewer than 4 in 10 say it has improved performance. For how AI answer engines are changing search, see our AI search engine statistics; to build content that answer engines cite, see our content engine service.

AI in SaaS Go-to-Market

AI is now standard in SaaS products and go-to-market teams, though most vendors do not charge for it separately. ICONIQ reports that 70% of companies have moderate or full AI adoption in go-to-market workflows, led by meeting transcription, lead generation and content creation, while account-executive quota attainment stayed flat (58% in 2025 to date against 59% in 2024). In Benchmarkit’s survey, 35% of companies first added AI to their product in the past 12 months, and the median company directed 10% of R&D spend to AI-specific work.

Investment is rising. CMOs in Gartner’s survey put 15.3% of marketing budgets into AI initiatives in 2026, but only 30% report mature AI readiness, and over half of companies in the KeyBanc and Sapphire survey planned to raise AI budgets by 20% or more.

FigureWhat it measuresSource
70%Share of companies reporting moderate or full AI adoption in go-to-market workflows, with meeting transcription, lead generation and content creation the top uses (ICONIQ State of Go-to-Market 2025)ICONIQ, 2025 edition, read Oct 21, 2026Survey
58%Share of account executives reaching quota in 2025 to date, against 59% in 2024 (ICONIQ State of Go-to-Market 2025)ICONIQ, 2025 edition, read Oct 21, 2026Survey
36%Share of High Alpha 2025 survey respondents that say AI is core to their product; 64% call it a supporting feature, and 70% have launched AI features with another 22% planning themHigh Alpha, 2025 edition, read Oct 21, 2026Survey
35%Share of B2B SaaS and AI-native companies that first added AI to their product in the past 12 months; 24% plan to add it in 2026 and 6% have no plans (254 companies, Benchmarkit 2026 survey)Benchmarkit 2026, Jun 1, 2026Survey
10%Median share of R&D spend going to AI-specific work at B2B SaaS companies, calendar 2025 (top quartile 30% or more; 46 companies, a small sample)Benchmarkit 2026, Jun 1, 2026Survey
15.3%Average share of marketing budgets that CMOs allocate to AI initiatives in 2026; 30% report mature or fully developed AI readiness (Gartner CMO Spend Survey of 401 CMOs and other marketing leaders, January–March 2026)Gartner, May 11, 2026Survey
Over halfShare of companies in the 2025 KeyBanc Capital Markets and Sapphire Ventures survey planning to raise AI budgets by 20% or more; nearly all plan an increaseKeyBanc/Sapphire, 2025 edition, read Oct 21, 2026Survey
3xHow much more likely AI-native startups were than other software startups to reach $1 million ARR within six months of first monetizing, in ChartMogul’s data on 6,525 companies; they were 8x more likely to reach $10 million within 12 monthsChartMogul, Oct 15, 2025Benchmark (platform data)

AI-native companies grow faster from the start: in ChartMogul’s data they were 3x more likely to reach $1 million ARR within six months, while 36% of High Alpha’s respondents now call AI core to their product. For an AI program tied to go-to-market metrics, see our AI transformation services.

Outlook: 2026 to 2027

Forecasts and plans point to more growth than companies have recently achieved. Gartner expects software spending to reach $1.68 trillion in 2027, up 14.6%. SaaS companies in Benchmarkit’s survey planned median growth of 26% for 2026 against the 20% they achieved in 2025, the fourth year in a row that plans ran ahead of results, and companies relying on outcome-based pricing planned 50%. Respondents to the KeyBanc and Sapphire survey expected EBITDA margins to turn positive and account-executive payback to shorten to 18 months by 2026.

FigureWhat it measuresSource
$1.68 trillionWorldwide software spending forecast for 2027, up 14.6% on 2026, within total IT spending forecast at $7.35 trillion (Gartner forecast, October 2026)Gartner, Oct 21, 2026Forecast
26%Median ARR growth that B2B SaaS companies planned for 2026, against the 20% median they achieved in 2025 (262 companies, Benchmarkit 2026 survey)Benchmarkit 2026, Jun 1, 2026Survey
50%Median growth planned for 2026 by SaaS companies relying on outcome-based pricing, the most optimistic pricing group (Benchmarkit 2026 survey)Benchmarkit 2026, Jun 1, 2026Survey
18 monthsAccount-executive payback period that private SaaS companies in the 2025 KeyBanc Capital Markets and Sapphire Ventures survey expect to reach by 2026KeyBanc/Sapphire, 2025 edition, read Oct 21, 2026Forecast
PositiveEBITDA margins that private SaaS companies in the 2025 KeyBanc Capital Markets and Sapphire Ventures survey expect by 2026, after improving every year since 2022KeyBanc/Sapphire, 2025 edition, read Oct 21, 2026Forecast

Widely Quoted SaaS Figures, Checked

Several SaaS statistics circulate with a source that does not publish them, or measures something else. Each one below is checked against the publisher’s own report.

Often quoted asWhat the source says
Median SaaS CAC payback is 18 months (OpenView 2026)OpenView handed its SaaS Benchmarks Report to High Alpha in 2024, and there is no OpenView 2026 edition. Benchmarkit’s 2026 survey gives a median of 16 months for calendar 2025, after 18 months in 2024 and 14 in 2023.
Top-quartile NRR is 118% and the median 105% (KeyBanc 2026)The latest KeyBanc Capital Markets and Sapphire Ventures survey is the 2025 edition, whose summary gives gross retention near 90% and net retention above 100%. Benchmarkit’s 2025 data gives a median of 102% and a top quartile of 110%.
Self-serve free trials convert at 4.6% (ChartMogul)ChartMogul’s January 2026 survey of 200 products gives a median free-to-paid conversion of 8%, ‘good’ free-trial conversion of 4–6% and 30% for trials that require a credit card. It has no 4.6% figure, and its sample is 200 products, not 4,200.
41% of SaaS pipeline comes from content and organic searchNo source found. The report it is credited to, a First Page Sage ‘SaaS Demand Report 2026’ of 720 marketing leaders, could not be found, and the paid-share trend quoted with it has no source either.
51% of public SaaS companies use usage-based pricing (Bessemer 2026)No Bessemer State of the Cloud 2026 was found. Current data measures something else: Benchmarkit compares NRR by pricing model (108% for usage-based-only, 98% for seat-based), and ICONIQ reports that about one in three companies use hybrid pricing.
Monthly logo churn is 0.7% for enterprise, 1.3% mid-market and 4.1% SMB (ChartMogul 2026)ChartMogul has published no 2026 retention report, and its reports measure revenue retention rather than logo churn by contract size. Benchmarkit’s 2025 gross revenue retention runs from 80% below $5,000 ACV to 91% at $50,000 to $100,000.
The median SaaS Magic Number fell to 0.7Benchmarkit’s median rose to 1.37 in calendar 2025, from 0.94 in 2024.
AI cuts SaaS CAC payback by 3 to 5 months (ICONIQ, Subscribed Institute)No source found. ICONIQ’s 2025 report measures AI adoption (70% moderate or full) and funnel conversion, not payback months.
Expansion drives 38% of new ARR at $25 million+ companies (KeyBanc)Benchmarkit’s 2025 medians are 52% at $20 million to $50 million ARR and 62% above $50 million, and 40% across all companies. ChartMogul puts expansion at up to 40% of growth for $15 million to $30 million+ companies in 2024.
SaaS companies with $1 million to $5 million ARR grow a median 74%High Alpha’s 2025 report gives a 50% median for companies of that size (upper quartile 100%), and Benchmarkit gives a 20% median across all companies in 2025.

Benchmark Against the Right Population

The most useful SaaS benchmark is one measured on companies like yours, on your definition. Benchmarkit’s medians describe B2B SaaS and AI-native companies reporting their own results; ChartMogul’s describe companies on its billing platform, many of them small and self-serve; public filings describe large companies on their own definitions. In Benchmarkit’s 2025 data, acquisition got more efficient while gross retention weakened and expansion held at 40% of new ARR, and all nine listed companies here spent a smaller share of revenue on sales and marketing.

For SaaS marketing teams, that points to three measures worth tracking every quarter on a fixed definition: CAC payback, gross and net revenue retention by segment, and free-to-paid conversion by acquisition channel. Pair them with how buyers now research, starting in AI chatbots and review sites, and plan content and search work around the questions buyers ask there. For the organic search side, see our agentic SEO services.

Sources

Every figure on this page comes from one of the sources below.

SaaS benchmark surveys
  • Benchmarkit (presenting sponsor Aleph)2026 B2B SaaS and AI-Native Performance Benchmarks (342 companies, calendar 2025 data)Jun 1, 2026
  • Benchmarkit2025 B2B SaaS Performance Metrics Benchmarks (583 participants, calendar 2024 data)May 2025
  • High Alpha2025 SaaS Benchmarks Report (800+ respondents; growth measured Q2 2024 to Q2 2025)2025 edition, read Oct 21, 2026
  • High AlphaDoes It Pay to Be AI-Native? Our Data Says Yes (from the 2025 SaaS Benchmarks survey)Dec 12, 2025
  • KeyBanc Capital Markets and Sapphire Ventures2025 KeyBanc Capital Markets & Sapphire Ventures SaaS Survey (summary page)2025 edition, read Oct 21, 2026
  • ICONIQ Venture & GrowthThe State of Go-to-Market in 20252025 edition, read Oct 21, 2026
ChartMogul research (billing data and survey)
  • ChartMogul (with ProductLed)The Conversion Report (200 software products, surveyed January 2026)Feb 4, 2026
  • ChartMogul (with ProductLed)The Conversion Report, Part 2 (same January 2026 survey)Mar 18, 2026
  • ChartMogulThe SaaS Go-To-Market Report (platform data, Q1 2024 to Q1 2025)Jun 11, 2025
  • ChartMogulThe AI churn wave (AI Retention Report, 3,500 software companies)Dec 10, 2025
  • ChartMogulThe Slow Decay of Growth (700+ private software companies)Apr 15, 2026
  • ChartMogulThe 30-day upsell window (10.5 million purchases, 4,029 companies)Sep 30, 2026
  • ChartMogulSaaS Retention Report: The New Normal for SaaS (2,500+ companies)Sep 3, 2024
  • ChartMogulWhat are the odds of making it? (6,525 software companies)Oct 15, 2025
Buyer and marketer surveys
  • G2The Answer Economy: G2’s 2026 AI Search Insight Report (1,076 B2B decision-makers, March 2026)2026 edition, read Oct 21, 2026
  • Content Marketing Institute and MarketingProfsB2B Content and Marketing Trends: Insights for 2026 (1,000+ B2B marketers; press release)Oct 8, 2025
Pages cited in the checks
  • High AlphaStewarding the Future of OpenView’s Iconic SaaS Benchmarks Report2024

Turn SaaS Benchmarks Into a Pipeline Plan

We help SaaS marketing teams connect content, search visibility and conversion data to the acquisition and retention metrics their boards track.

Content built for search and AI answers
Trial and conversion analytics
Pipeline and payback reporting

Digital Applied newsletter

Deep dives on AI, marketing and development.

Practical guides and fresh insights by email. No recycled takes.

Related Articles

Continue exploring with these related guides