LinkedIn Ads Benchmarks 2026: CPC, CTR, CVR by Industry
LinkedIn Ads benchmarks for 2026 from published data: cost per click, CTR, CPM and cost per lead by industry, company size and ad format, each with its source.
LinkedIn cost per click, B2B advertisers, 2025 (Metadata, spend-weighted)
LinkedIn click-through rate, 2025 (Metadata)
LinkedIn cost per lead, 2025 (Metadata); median advertiser $376
Cost per lead with Lead Gen Forms vs $346 via landing pages (Metadata)
Key Takeaways
What does LinkedIn advertising cost in 2026? It depends on the audience, the ad format, the bidding strategy and whose data you use. LinkedIn publishes no public average cost per click or cost per lead, and many widely shared figures are years old or have no source.
This page collects LinkedIn benchmarks whose publishers say whose accounts they measured and over what period: Metadata's 2026 B2B benchmark, Dreamdata's annual LinkedIn report, ZenABM, HockeyStack and Huble, alongside Microsoft's filings and LinkedIn's own rules on pricing and measurement. Every row names its source and period. Figures were last checked on September 23, 2026. For help applying them to your account, see our paid media work.
How to read this page: "Benchmark (platform data)" comes from one company's own customer or platform data: Metadata's figures are mostly spend-weighted across its advertisers (plus a spread of per-advertiser results), ZenABM's are medians across companies (each company's figure first), HockeyStack's are averages, and Dreamdata's come from its customers' aggregated data without saying whether they are averages or medians, and are in euros. In Metadata's cuts, click-through rate, cost per click and CPM cover every campaign, while cost per lead and the share of clicks becoming leads cover lead-generation campaigns only. "Benchmark (agency client data)" is Huble's 2024 client results, in pounds. "Official (company-reported)" comes from Microsoft's filings and earnings calls and LinkedIn's Pressroom. "Platform rule" is how LinkedIn's help pages say pricing and metrics work. "Vendor claim" is a figure LinkedIn states about its own products without a published method. Every source is listed once in the Sources section at the end.
Headline LinkedIn Ads Benchmarks
LinkedIn does not publish an average cost per click or click-through rate on its website or help pages. The figures that exist come from companies that measure their own customers' accounts. The most detailed of the sources checked here is Metadata's 2026 B2B Paid Media Benchmark, covering 138 B2B advertisers' LinkedIn spend in 2025: $9.39 per click, a 0.67% click-through rate, a $63.19 CPM and $202 per lead.
Metadata's figures are spend-weighted, so its biggest spenders count most. Dreamdata's 2026 report, from its own B2B customers, puts cost per click lower at €5.98 and CPM at €34.33. The two samples differ in size, currency and possibly method, so a gap of this kind is normal. Quote the source and period with the figure.
| Figure | What it measures | Source |
|---|---|---|
| $9.39 | Cost per click on LinkedIn ads, spend-weighted across B2B advertisers using Metadata, calendar 2025 (138 advertisers; delivery metrics cover every campaign, not only lead generation) | Metadata, Sep 8, 2026 · 2025 dataBenchmark (platform data) |
| 0.67% | Click-through rate on LinkedIn ads, spend-weighted across B2B advertisers using Metadata, calendar 2025 (138 advertisers) | Metadata, Sep 8, 2026 · 2025 dataBenchmark (platform data) |
| $63.19 | Cost per 1,000 impressions (CPM) on LinkedIn ads, spend-weighted across B2B advertisers using Metadata, calendar 2025 (138 advertisers) | Metadata, Sep 8, 2026 · 2025 dataBenchmark (platform data) |
| 5.9% | Share of clicks on LinkedIn lead-generation campaigns that became leads, spend-weighted across B2B advertisers using Metadata, calendar 2025 (138 advertisers) | Metadata, Sep 8, 2026 · 2025 dataBenchmark (platform data) |
| $202 | Cost per lead on LinkedIn lead-generation campaigns, spend-weighted across B2B advertisers using Metadata, calendar 2025 | Metadata, Sep 8, 2026 · 2025 dataBenchmark (platform data) |
| $11.93 | Cost per click on LinkedIn campaigns that use LinkedIn's native Lead Gen Forms, spend-weighted across 97 Metadata advertisers, 2025 (click-through rate 0.61%, CPM $72.53) | Metadata, generated Sep 16, 2026Benchmark (platform data) |
| 153 | B2B advertisers in Metadata's 2026 benchmark, which covers $57.6 million of paid media run through Metadata in 2025 across LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram and Google Ads (plus smaller Reddit and Microsoft Ads spend); 138 of them contribute to the LinkedIn figures | Metadata, Aug 20, 2026 · 2025 dataBenchmark (platform data) |
| €5.98 | Cost per click on LinkedIn ads across Dreamdata's B2B customers, 2026 report edition (2025 data), in euros | Dreamdata, Mar 10, 2026Benchmark (platform data) |
| €34.33 | CPM on LinkedIn ads across Dreamdata's B2B customers, 2026 report edition (2025 data), in euros | Dreamdata, Mar 10, 2026Benchmark (platform data) |
| 0.57% | Click-through rate on LinkedIn ads across Dreamdata's B2B customers, 2026 report edition (2025 data) | Dreamdata, Mar 10, 2026Benchmark (platform data) |
What a LinkedIn Lead Costs
A single average hides a wide spread. Metadata ranked each advertiser by its own LinkedIn cost per lead: the advertiser in the middle paid $376, nearly double the spend-weighted $202, and the most expensive tenth paid more than $1,340. Large advertisers with lower costs pull the weighted figure down.
Retargeting was dearer than prospecting in Metadata's LinkedIn data, at $234 against $194 per lead.
| Figure | What it measures | Source |
|---|---|---|
| $109 | 10th percentile of LinkedIn cost per lead across individual Metadata advertisers, each ranked by its own cost per lead, 2025 (the cheapest tenth of advertisers pay less) | Metadata, Sep 8, 2026 · 2025 dataBenchmark (platform data) |
| $196 | 25th percentile of LinkedIn cost per lead across individual Metadata advertisers, each ranked by its own cost per lead, 2025 | Metadata, Sep 8, 2026 · 2025 dataBenchmark (platform data) |
| $376 | Median of LinkedIn cost per lead across individual Metadata advertisers, each ranked by its own cost per lead, 2025: the advertiser in the middle pays nearly double the spend-weighted $202 | Metadata, Sep 8, 2026 · 2025 dataBenchmark (platform data) |
| $658 | 75th percentile of LinkedIn cost per lead across individual Metadata advertisers, each ranked by its own cost per lead, 2025 | Metadata, Sep 8, 2026 · 2025 dataBenchmark (platform data) |
| $1,340 | 90th percentile of LinkedIn cost per lead across individual Metadata advertisers, each ranked by its own cost per lead, 2025 (the most expensive tenth of advertisers pay more) | Metadata, Sep 8, 2026 · 2025 dataBenchmark (platform data) |
| 4.0% | Median share of clicks on LinkedIn lead-generation campaigns that became leads, across individual Metadata advertisers, 2025 (95 advertisers; 25th percentile 2.0%, 75th percentile 7.5%) | Metadata, generated Sep 16, 2026Benchmark (platform data) |
| $194 | LinkedIn cost per lead for prospecting (cold) audiences, spend-weighted across 94 Metadata advertisers, 2025, at 6.6% of clicks becoming leads | Metadata, Sep 8, 2026 · 2025 dataBenchmark (platform data) |
| $234 | LinkedIn cost per lead for retargeting audiences, spend-weighted across 77 Metadata advertisers, 2025 | Metadata, Sep 8, 2026 · 2025 dataBenchmark (platform data) |
Benchmarks by Industry
None of the sources checked for this page publishes dated LinkedIn benchmarks for a long list of industries; The B2B House lists 12 industries but gives no period. Metadata splits its data into three advertiser groups: B2B technology, financial services and everyone else. Financial services advertisers paid the most, at $11.82 per click and $417 per lead, from a small group of 11 advertisers.
ZenABM publishes medians by LinkedIn industry for companies running account-based marketing (ABM) campaigns, which target named company lists and are mostly B2B SaaS. Its figures are medians per company, so they are not comparable with Metadata's spend-weighted ones.
| Figure | What it measures | Source |
|---|---|---|
| $9.16 | B2B technology advertisers: LinkedIn cost per click, spend-weighted across Metadata advertisers in the bucket, 2025 (89 advertisers; click-through rate 0.69%, 5.8% of lead-generation clicks becoming leads, cost per lead $198) | Metadata, generated Sep 16, 2026Benchmark (platform data) |
| $11.82 | Financial services advertisers: LinkedIn cost per click, spend-weighted across Metadata advertisers in the bucket, 2025 (11 advertisers; click-through rate 0.95%, 4.6% of lead-generation clicks becoming leads, cost per lead $417) | Metadata, generated Sep 16, 2026Benchmark (platform data) |
| $10.44 | Advertisers outside B2B technology and financial services: LinkedIn cost per click, spend-weighted across Metadata advertisers in the bucket, 2025 (38 advertisers; click-through rate 0.58%, 6.6% of lead-generation clicks becoming leads, cost per lead $212) | Metadata, generated Sep 16, 2026Benchmark (platform data) |
| $5.59 | Software development companies: LinkedIn cost per click, median per company, LinkedIn account-based marketing campaigns of ZenABM users, 2025 (click-through rate 0.80%, CPM $42.50) | ZenABM, Jan 2, 2026Benchmark (platform data) |
| $4.86 | IT services and IT consulting companies: LinkedIn cost per click, median per company, LinkedIn account-based marketing campaigns of ZenABM users, 2025 (click-through rate 0.61%, CPM $34.38) | ZenABM, Jan 2, 2026Benchmark (platform data) |
| $6.73 | Technology, information and internet companies: LinkedIn cost per click, median per company, LinkedIn account-based marketing campaigns of ZenABM users, 2025 (click-through rate 1.28%, CPM $48.67) | ZenABM, Jan 2, 2026Benchmark (platform data) |
| $5.47 | Advertising services companies: LinkedIn cost per click, median per company, LinkedIn account-based marketing campaigns of ZenABM users, 2025 (click-through rate 1.12%, CPM $39.77) | ZenABM, Jan 2, 2026Benchmark (platform data) |
| $4.77 | Marketing services companies: LinkedIn cost per click, median per company, LinkedIn account-based marketing campaigns of ZenABM users, 2025 (click-through rate 0.64%, CPM $30.31) | ZenABM, Jan 2, 2026Benchmark (platform data) |
Cost per Lead by Company Size
In Metadata's data, advertisers with 51 to 200 employees paid the least per LinkedIn lead ($144), and cost per lead was higher in each of the larger size bands, though it did not rise steadily. Cost per click stayed between $9.46 and $11.45 across the bands.
| Figure | What it measures | Source |
|---|---|---|
| $144 | Advertisers with 51–200 employees: LinkedIn cost per lead, spend-weighted across Metadata advertisers of that size, 2025 (35 advertisers; cost per click $9.76) | Metadata, generated Sep 16, 2026Benchmark (platform data) |
| $189 | Advertisers with 201–500 employees: LinkedIn cost per lead, spend-weighted across Metadata advertisers of that size, 2025 (17 advertisers; cost per click $9.99) | Metadata, generated Sep 16, 2026Benchmark (platform data) |
| $225 | Advertisers with 501–1,000 employees: LinkedIn cost per lead, spend-weighted across Metadata advertisers of that size, 2025 (25 advertisers; cost per click $11.45) | Metadata, generated Sep 16, 2026Benchmark (platform data) |
| $211 | Advertisers with 1,001–5,000 employees: LinkedIn cost per lead, spend-weighted across Metadata advertisers of that size, 2025 (27 advertisers; cost per click $9.46) | Metadata, generated Sep 16, 2026Benchmark (platform data) |
Benchmarks by Ad Format
Document ads produced the cheapest leads in Metadata's 2025 data, at $142 against $200 for single image and $265 for video, with the highest click-through rate (1.23%). Carousel ads were the most expensive per lead, at $668. Conversation Ads and Message Ads are charged per send rather than per click, so only their cost per lead is comparable with the feed formats.
| Figure | What it measures | Source |
|---|---|---|
| $142 | Document ads: LinkedIn cost per lead, spend-weighted across Metadata advertisers, 2025 (51 advertisers; click-through rate 1.23%, 11.9% of clicks becoming leads) | Metadata, generated Sep 16, 2026Benchmark (platform data) |
| $200 | Single image ads: LinkedIn cost per lead, spend-weighted across Metadata advertisers, 2025 (127 advertisers; click-through rate 0.66%, cost per click $8.90) | Metadata, generated Sep 16, 2026Benchmark (platform data) |
| $265 | Video ads: LinkedIn cost per lead, spend-weighted across Metadata advertisers, 2025 (81 advertisers; click-through rate 0.47%, cost per click $13.10) | Metadata, generated Sep 16, 2026Benchmark (platform data) |
| $668 | Carousel ads: LinkedIn cost per lead, spend-weighted across Metadata advertisers, 2025 (44 advertisers; click-through rate 0.54%, 1.4% of clicks becoming leads) | Metadata, generated Sep 16, 2026Benchmark (platform data) |
| $362 | Conversation Ads: LinkedIn cost per lead, spend-weighted across Metadata advertisers, 2025 (51 advertisers) | Metadata, generated Sep 16, 2026Benchmark (platform data) |
| $371 | Message Ads: LinkedIn cost per lead, spend-weighted across Metadata advertisers, 2025 (15 advertisers) | Metadata, generated Sep 16, 2026Benchmark (platform data) |
| 2x | Form completion rate of Document Ads that use Lead Gen Forms compared with other feed ad formats, according to LinkedIn (no period or sample stated) | LinkedIn, Aug 19, 2025Vendor claim |
Lead Gen Forms vs Landing Pages
LinkedIn's Lead Gen Forms open inside LinkedIn with the member's profile details filled in. In Metadata's 2025 data they produced leads for $193, against $346 when the ad sent clicks to a landing page. LinkedIn's own blog gives an average Lead Gen Form conversion rate of 13%, but states no period or sample.
Check the denominator before comparing conversion rates. LinkedIn's conversion rate divides conversions by clicks, while its lead form completion rate divides submissions by form opens. A form completion rate will usually look higher than a conversion rate from the same campaign.
| Figure | What it measures | Source |
|---|---|---|
| $193 | LinkedIn cost per lead when the ad opens a native Lead Gen Form, spend-weighted across 97 Metadata advertisers, 2025 (6.2% of clicks becoming leads) | Metadata, generated Sep 16, 2026Benchmark (platform data) |
| $346 | LinkedIn cost per lead when the ad sends clicks to a landing page, spend-weighted across Metadata advertisers, 2025 (3.0% of clicks becoming leads) | Metadata, generated Sep 16, 2026Benchmark (platform data) |
| 13% | Average LinkedIn Lead Gen Form conversion rate, according to LinkedIn, which compares it with a 4.02% average landing-page conversion rate from an Unbounce study (no period, sample or conversion definition stated) | LinkedIn, Aug 19, 2025Vendor claim |
| Per click | LinkedIn's definition of conversion rate in Campaign Manager: conversions divided by clicks, where conversions can include view-through and modeled conversions | LinkedIn Help, read Sep 23, 2026Platform rule |
| Per form open | LinkedIn's definition of lead form completion rate: form submissions divided by form opens, a different base from conversion rate | LinkedIn Help, read Sep 23, 2026Platform rule |
LinkedIn vs Other Channels
LinkedIn clicks cost far more than Facebook or Instagram clicks, but cost per click is not the whole picture. In Metadata's B2B sample, LinkedIn's $202 per lead was above Facebook ($145) and Instagram ($138) but well below Google Ads ($524). Metadata also traced $10.20 of pipeline to each $1 of LinkedIn lead-generation spend among advertisers who connected their CRM.
For the other platforms, see our Google Ads benchmarks and Facebook ads benchmarks.
| Figure | What it measures | Source |
|---|---|---|
| $202 | LinkedIn cost per lead, B2B advertisers using Metadata, spend-weighted, 2025 (138 advertisers; cost per click $9.39) | Metadata, Aug 20, 2026 · 2025 dataBenchmark (platform data) |
| $145 | Facebook cost per lead, B2B advertisers using Metadata, spend-weighted, 2025 (71 advertisers; cost per click $1.95) | Metadata, Aug 20, 2026 · 2025 dataBenchmark (platform data) |
| $138 | Instagram cost per lead, B2B advertisers using Metadata, spend-weighted, 2025 (49 advertisers; cost per click $2.82) | Metadata, Aug 20, 2026 · 2025 dataBenchmark (platform data) |
| $524 | Google Ads cost per lead, B2B advertisers using Metadata, spend-weighted, 2025 (56 advertisers; cost per click $9.76) | Metadata, Aug 20, 2026 · 2025 dataBenchmark (platform data) |
| $10.20 | Pipeline sourced per $1 of LinkedIn lead-generation spend, across 94 Metadata advertisers with pipeline traced to their LinkedIn ads, 2025 | Metadata, Sep 8, 2026 · 2025 dataBenchmark (platform data) |
| $58,572 | Cost per customer won from LinkedIn ads across the same 94 Metadata advertisers, 2025, with 19.5% of closed ad-sourced opportunities won | Metadata, Sep 8, 2026 · 2025 dataBenchmark (platform data) |
| 121% | Return on ad spend from LinkedIn ads measured with Dreamdata's attribution across its B2B customers, 2025 (113% in 2024) | Dreamdata, Mar 10, 2026Benchmark (platform data) |
| 41% | LinkedIn's share of B2B ad budgets across Dreamdata's customers, 2026 report edition, up 2 points on the previous edition | Dreamdata, Mar 10, 2026Benchmark (platform data) |
What Changed Year on Year
Dreamdata is the only source here with two consecutive editions of the same report. Between its 2025 and 2026 reports, LinkedIn cost per click rose about 12% and CPM about 29%, while click-through rate edged up from 0.51% to 0.57%. Metadata's 2026 benchmark has no comparable earlier edition.
Costs also move within the year. Across HockeyStack's B2B SaaS customers, the average cost per click was lowest in the first quarter ($10.48) and highest in the third ($15.72). These are averages from about 70 B2B SaaS companies over three years, and the report's text refers to 2023 and 2024, so they are older than the other figures here and run above them.
| Figure | What it measures | Source |
|---|---|---|
| +11.8% | Change in LinkedIn cost per click across Dreamdata's B2B customers, between the 2025 report edition (2024 data) and the 2026 edition (2025 data), from €5.35 to €5.98 (percentage calculated from Dreamdata's tables) | Dreamdata, Mar 5, 2025Benchmark (platform data) |
| +29.0% | Change in LinkedIn CPM across Dreamdata's B2B customers, between the 2025 report edition (2024 data) and the 2026 edition (2025 data), from €26.62 to €34.33 (percentage calculated from Dreamdata's tables) | Dreamdata, Mar 5, 2025Benchmark (platform data) |
| 0.51% → 0.57% | LinkedIn click-through rate across Dreamdata's B2B customers, between the 2025 report edition (2024 data) and the 2026 edition (2025 data) | Dreamdata, Mar 5, 2025Benchmark (platform data) |
| €154 → €70.11 | LinkedIn cost per company influenced across Dreamdata's B2B customers, between the 2025 report edition (2024 data) and the 2026 edition (2025 data); the 2026 edition added data from LinkedIn's Company Intelligence API, so the change is partly a data change | Dreamdata, Mar 10, 2026Benchmark (platform data) |
| $10.48 | Average LinkedIn cost per click in the first quarter across 70+ B2B SaaS companies using HockeyStack (about $28 million of spend over three years; the report's text refers to 2023 and 2024), the lowest of the quarters it reports (click-through rate 0.82%) | HockeyStack, Dec 15, 2025Benchmark (platform data) |
| $15.72 | Average LinkedIn cost per click in the third quarter across the same 70+ HockeyStack customers and period, the highest quarter (click-through rate 0.96%) | HockeyStack, Dec 15, 2025Benchmark (platform data) |
Benchmarks by Region
Regional cost data is thin. The agency Huble publishes its 2024 client results by region in pounds sterling: single image clicks cost £4.34 in North America against £1.55 in Asia-Pacific. It does not state how many clients or campaigns the figures cover. LinkedIn's Pressroom gives member counts by region, which show where the audience is but not what it costs to reach.
| Figure | What it measures | Source |
|---|---|---|
| £4.34 | North America: LinkedIn cost per click, Huble's agency clients, single image ads by targeted region, 2024, in pounds sterling (click-through rate 0.35%) | Huble, read Sep 23, 2026 · 2024 dataBenchmark (agency client data) |
| £3.98 | Europe, Middle East and Africa: LinkedIn cost per click, Huble's agency clients, single image ads by targeted region, 2024, in pounds sterling (click-through rate 0.29%) | Huble, read Sep 23, 2026 · 2024 dataBenchmark (agency client data) |
| £1.55 | Asia-Pacific: LinkedIn cost per click, Huble's agency clients, single image ads by targeted region, 2024, in pounds sterling (click-through rate 0.56%) | Huble, read Sep 23, 2026 · 2024 dataBenchmark (agency client data) |
| £1.62 | South America (Huble's LATAM): LinkedIn cost per click, Huble's agency clients, single image ads by targeted region, 2024, in pounds sterling (click-through rate 0.68%) | Huble, read Sep 23, 2026 · 2024 dataBenchmark (agency client data) |
| 430M+ | LinkedIn members in Europe, the Middle East and Africa, as listed by LinkedIn's Pressroom (registered members, not active users) | LinkedIn, read Sep 23, 2026Official (company-reported) |
| 410M+ | LinkedIn members in Asia-Pacific, as listed by LinkedIn's Pressroom | LinkedIn, read Sep 23, 2026Official (company-reported) |
| 290M+ | LinkedIn members in North America (US and Canada), as listed by LinkedIn's Pressroom | LinkedIn, read Sep 23, 2026Official (company-reported) |
| 226M+ | LinkedIn members in South and Central America, including Mexico and the Caribbean, as listed by LinkedIn's Pressroom | LinkedIn, read Sep 23, 2026Official (company-reported) |
Message Ads, Conversation Ads and Video
Since July 2024, LinkedIn no longer reports click or impression metrics for Message Ads and Conversation Ads, so older "Message Ad CPC" figures have no current equivalent. LinkedIn says more than one in two prospects open a Message Ad, without a date or sample.
On its call for the quarter to December 2025, Microsoft cited 30% growth in LinkedIn paid video ads. In Huble's 2024 client data, video ads had a click-through rate of 0.20%, against 0.39% for single image ads.
| Figure | What it measures | Source |
|---|---|---|
| More than 1 in 2 | Share of prospects who open a LinkedIn Message Ad, according to LinkedIn's Message Ads page (undated, no sample stated) | LinkedIn, read Sep 23, 2026Vendor claim |
| July 2024 | Since July 2024, LinkedIn no longer reports impressions, clicks, CPM or CPC for Message Ads and Conversation Ads; it measures them by sends, opens, open rate and cost per send or open | LinkedIn Help, read Sep 23, 2026Platform rule |
| Per send | How LinkedIn charges for Sponsored Messaging (Message Ads and Conversation Ads), under both automated and manual bidding | LinkedIn Help, read Sep 23, 2026Platform rule |
| 0.20% | Click-through rate on LinkedIn video ads, Huble's agency clients, all regions, 2024 (cost per click £6.39) | Huble, read Sep 23, 2026 · 2024 dataBenchmark (agency client data) |
| 34.88% | View rate on LinkedIn video ads, Huble's agency clients, all regions, 2024 (completion rate 23.02%) | Huble, read Sep 23, 2026 · 2024 dataBenchmark (agency client data) |
| +30% | Growth in paid video ads on LinkedIn that Microsoft reported for the quarter to December 31, 2025, without stating whether it measures revenue, spend or ad volume | Microsoft, Jan 28, 2026Official (company-reported) |
What LinkedIn and Microsoft Report
Microsoft reports LinkedIn revenue as one line: $19.8 billion in the fiscal year to June 2026, up 11%. That figure includes subscriptions and recruiting products as well as advertising. Microsoft has attributed recent growth mainly to Marketing Solutions, LinkedIn's advertising business, but does not report its revenue, ad prices or ad volumes.
| Figure | What it measures | Source |
|---|---|---|
| $19.8 billion | LinkedIn revenue in Microsoft's fiscal 2026 (July 2025 to June 2026), up 11%, across Marketing Solutions, Talent Solutions, Premium and Sales Solutions combined | Microsoft, Jul 29, 2026Official (company-reported) |
| $17.8 billion | LinkedIn revenue in Microsoft's fiscal 2025 (July 2024 to June 2025), up 9% | Microsoft, Jul 30, 2025Official (company-reported) |
| +12% | LinkedIn revenue growth in the quarter to June 30, 2026 (10% in constant currency) | Microsoft, Jul 29, 2026Official (company-reported) |
| Marketing Solutions | What Microsoft said primarily drove LinkedIn's 12% revenue growth in the quarter to June 30, 2026; Microsoft does not report Marketing Solutions revenue separately | Microsoft, Jul 29, 2026Official (company-reported) |
| High single digits | Microsoft's guidance for LinkedIn revenue growth in the quarter to September 30, 2026 | Microsoft, Jul 29, 2026Official (company-reported) |
| 1.3B+ | LinkedIn members, as listed by LinkedIn's Pressroom, with five years of double-digit member growth | LinkedIn, read Sep 23, 2026Official (company-reported) |
| 40% | Share of B2B marketers surveyed who say LinkedIn is the most effective channel for driving high-quality leads, according to LinkedIn (survey not identified) | LinkedIn, read Sep 23, 2026Vendor claim |
How LinkedIn Charges
LinkedIn ads are sold by auction, so there is no list price. LinkedIn says cost depends on demand for the target audience, the bidding strategy, the objective and the ad's relevance. One detail changes how to read "cost per click": Sponsored Content ad sets on automated (Maximum delivery) or cost-cap bidding are charged per impression, so their reported cost per click is spend divided by clicks rather than a price per click.
For targeting options that affect cost, see our guide to LinkedIn job and seniority targeting in Microsoft Ads.
| Figure | What it measures | Source |
|---|---|---|
| $10 | Minimum daily budget to start advertising on LinkedIn, for any ad format | LinkedIn, read Sep 23, 2026Platform rule |
| $100 | Minimum lifetime budget for new, inactive LinkedIn campaigns | LinkedIn, read Sep 23, 2026Platform rule |
| $0.01 | Lowest manual bid LinkedIn accepts per result (or the local-currency equivalent); Campaign Manager suggests a bid range and warns when a bid is too low | LinkedIn Help, read Sep 23, 2026Platform rule |
| Per impression | How LinkedIn charges Sponsored Content ad sets on Maximum delivery or Cost cap bidding, including website-visit, lead-generation and conversion objectives; only manual bidding is charged per click | LinkedIn Help, read Sep 23, 2026Platform rule |
| 300 | Minimum audience size for a LinkedIn campaign; LinkedIn recommends 50,000 or more for single image and text ads and over 15,000 for Message Ads | LinkedIn, read Sep 23, 2026Platform rule |
| 90 days | Period behind Campaign Manager's industry benchmark, which compares an advertiser's ad sets with similar ad sets from industry peers and shows only the percentage difference | LinkedIn Help, read Sep 23, 2026Platform rule |
| 42% | Lower cost per action for LinkedIn's AI-powered Accelerate campaigns than advertisers' usual Classic campaigns, in a LinkedIn study of 29 A/B tests | LinkedIn, Oct 1, 2024Vendor claim |
How to Use These Benchmarks
Compare like with like. Metadata's own LinkedIn cost per lead is $202 spend-weighted but $376 for its median advertiser, so a spend-weighted figure (Metadata) and a median across companies (ZenABM) should not be compared directly, and euro, pound and dollar figures cannot share a column. Use cost per lead or pipeline for lead-generation campaigns, and treat click-through rate and CPM as delivery checks.
Campaign Manager's industry benchmark compares your ad sets with similar ones from the last 90 days, which is often a better yardstick than any published average. For newer ad products, see our guide to LinkedIn's Creator Marketplace and BrandWorks.
Widely Quoted Figures, Checked
Several LinkedIn Ads statistics circulate without a source, or with a source that says something different. Each one below is checked against the publisher's own page.
| Often quoted as | What the source says |
|---|---|
| The average LinkedIn CPC is $5.74 | This matches a 2016 HubSpot post about its own US customers' LinkedIn ads, which gives "around $5.74 per click". It is not a current benchmark. Metadata's 2025 figure is $9.39 (spend-weighted) and Dreamdata's is €5.98. |
| LinkedIn Lead Gen Forms convert at 6.1%, five times the rate of landing pages | The same 2016 HubSpot post gives a 6.1% conversion rate for its US customers' Sponsored Content, not a Lead Gen Form rate. LinkedIn's blog gives 13% for Lead Gen Forms against 4.02% for landing pages (Unbounce). In Metadata's 2025 data, Lead Gen Forms cost $193 per lead against $346 for landing pages. |
| The average LinkedIn cost per lead is about $94 | None of the benchmark publishers or LinkedIn pages listed here gives $94. The 2016 HubSpot post worked out about $90 per lead in a $1,000 example using its US customers' average cost per click and conversion rate. Metadata's 2025 figure is $202 spend-weighted, and its median advertiser paid $376. |
| The average LinkedIn CPM is $33.80 | This figure appears on The B2B House's benchmark page, which gives no period or sample for it. Metadata's 2025 CPM is $63.19 (spend-weighted) and Dreamdata's is €34.33. |
| 70% of B2B marketers rate LinkedIn the best source of high-quality leads | LinkedIn's own advertising page says 40% of B2B marketers surveyed call it the most effective channel for high-quality leads, without naming the survey. |
| LinkedIn's ad business earned $9.4 billion in 2025 | Microsoft does not report LinkedIn's advertising revenue. Total LinkedIn revenue, including subscriptions and recruiting, was $19.8 billion in the year to June 2026. LinkedIn's Pressroom last gave one in July 2022, when Marketing Solutions passed $5 billion in annual revenue. The $9.4 billion is not a Microsoft figure. |
| Message Ads get a 47% open rate at $0.81 per send | None of the benchmark publishers or LinkedIn pages listed here gives these figures. LinkedIn's Message Ads page says more than one in two prospects open a Message Ad, without a date or sample. |
Quote the Source, the Method and the Period
When you quote a LinkedIn Ads benchmark, carry the source, the method and the period with it: "B2B advertisers paid $202 per LinkedIn lead in 2025, spend-weighted (Metadata)" is checkable, while "the average LinkedIn CPL is $94" is not.
Use these figures to judge whether your own results are in a normal range, then optimise against your own cost per lead, pipeline and revenue.
Sources
Every figure on this page comes from one of the sources below.
- Microsoft CorporationForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2026Jul 29, 2026
- Microsoft CorporationForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025Jul 30, 2025
- Microsoft CorporationMicrosoft Cloud and AI Strength Fuels Fourth Quarter ResultsJul 29, 2026
- Microsoft CorporationFiscal Year 2026 Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference CallJul 29, 2026
- Microsoft CorporationFiscal Year 2026 Second Quarter Earnings Conference CallJan 28, 2026
- LinkedIn PressroomAbout Usread Sep 23, 2026
- LinkedIn PressroomLinkedIn Business Highlights from Microsoft's FY22 Q4 EarningsJul 26, 2022
- LinkedIn Marketing Solutions HelpCampaign Manager reporting dashboardread Sep 23, 2026
- LinkedIn Marketing Solutions HelpConversions and leads metrics in Campaign Managerread Sep 23, 2026
- LinkedIn Marketing Solutions HelpSponsored Messaging metrics in Campaign Managerread Sep 23, 2026
- LinkedIn Marketing Solutions HelpObjective-based pricing for LinkedIn advertisingread Sep 23, 2026
- LinkedIn Marketing Solutions HelpManual biddingread Sep 23, 2026
- LinkedIn Marketing Solutions HelpLinkedIn’s advertising cost and pricingread Sep 23, 2026
- LinkedIn Marketing SolutionsCampaign budgets for Your LinkedIn Adsread Sep 23, 2026
- LinkedIn Marketing SolutionsReach an audience of 1 billion+ business professionalsread Sep 23, 2026
- LinkedIn Marketing SolutionsMessage Adsread Sep 23, 2026
- LinkedIn Marketing BlogHow to Use LinkedIn Lead Gen FormsAug 19, 2025
- LinkedIn Marketing BlogHere's How LinkedIn's New AI-Powered Campaigns Help You Do More with LessOct 1, 2024
- MetadataLinkedIn ads cost for B2B: CPL, CPC, CPM and the full distributionSep 8, 2026 · 2025 data
- MetadataB2B advertising benchmarks: CTR, CPC, CPM and cost per lead by channelAug 20, 2026 · 2025 data
- Metadata2026 B2B Paid Media Benchmark data file (benchmarks-2026.json)generated Sep 16, 2026
- DreamdataAnnouncing The 2026 LinkedIn Ads Benchmarks Report by DreamdataMar 10, 2026
- DreamdataThe 2025 LinkedIn Ads Benchmarks Report has dropped - here are the highlightsMar 5, 2025
- ZenABMLinkedIn ABM 2026 – Performance Benchmarks Report & Top Performing LinkedIn AdsJan 2, 2026
- HockeyStack Labs2025 LinkedIn Ads Benchmark Report for B2B MarketersDec 15, 2025
- HubleLinkedIn Ads benchmarks for 2025read Sep 23, 2026 · 2024 data
- HubSpot5 Things We've Learned After a Year With LinkedIn Adsfirst published 2016 (page now dated Feb 12, 2020)
- The B2B HouseLinkedin Ad Benchmarks 2026 – An Always Up-to-date GuideJun 11, 2025 (page metadata)
Benchmark Your LinkedIn Ads Against the Right Data
We plan, run and measure LinkedIn campaigns against your own cost per lead and pipeline, not generic averages.
Deep dives on AI, marketing and development.
Practical guides and fresh insights by email. No recycled takes.
Related Articles
Continue exploring with these related guides