AI Development11 min readSourced Data

MCP Adoption Statistics 2026: Registry, SDK and CVE Data

MCP adoption statistics for 2026: official registry counts, npm and PyPI SDK downloads, platform support, enterprise survey results and NVD vulnerability data.

Digital Applied Team
April 20, 2026• Updated October 21, 2026
11 min read
47,267

Active servers in the official MCP Registry, Oct 21, 2026

231.9M

npm downloads of the TypeScript MCP SDK in Sept 2026 (31.3M a year earlier)

45%

Large software firms running MCP in production (Stacklok survey, Dec 2025)

382

MCP-related CVE records in the NVD to Oct 21, 2026

Key Takeaways

The official registry has grown nearly 40-fold since the end of 2025: On October 21, 2026 the official MCP Registry held 47,879 server names (47,267 active), against 1,204 first published by the end of 2025; 66% of active servers now list a remote endpoint.
SDK downloads now run to hundreds of millions a month: npm recorded 231.9M downloads of the TypeScript SDK in September 2026, up from 31.3M a year earlier; the MCP project puts its Tier 1 SDKs at close to half a billion a month.
OpenAI, Google and Microsoft all support MCP: All three added MCP support during 2025, and MCP moved to the Linux Foundation’s Agentic AI Foundation in December 2025; the foundation now lists 286 member organisations.
Production use is real but not yet the norm: In Stacklok’s December 2025 survey, 45% of large software companies ran MCP servers in production and 41% across three industries; security was the top obstacle, cited by 64%.
The protocol and its risks both moved in 2026: The 2026-07-28 specification made MCP stateless and deprecated Roots, Sampling and Logging, while MCP-related vulnerability records in the NVD reached 382.

How widely is the Model Context Protocol used in 2026? MCP, the open standard Anthropic released in November 2024 for connecting AI applications to tools and data, now has an official registry, official SDKs in ten languages and support from OpenAI, Google and Microsoft. Putting numbers on it is harder: server counts depend on which directory is counted, download figures move by tens of millions a month, and several widely shared statistics have no source at all.

This page collects MCP adoption figures that can be traced to their publisher: counts read on October 21, 2026 from the official MCP Registry, npm, PyPI, GitHub and the US National Vulnerability Database, the MCP project’s own announcements, company launch posts, Stacklok’s enterprise survey and security research published on arXiv. Every row names its source and period. For help applying MCP in your own stack, see our AI transformation work.

MCP Adoption at a Glance

No single number captures MCP adoption. The official MCP Registry is the closest thing to a census of public servers: on October 21, 2026 it listed 47,267 active servers. Anthropic’s figure of more than 10,000 active public servers dates from December 2025 and is its latest published count. Neither figure includes the private servers that companies run for internal use.

Downloads tell the same story. The official TypeScript SDK was downloaded 231.9M times from npm in September 2026, against 31.3M a year earlier, and the Python SDK 260.8M times from PyPI in the 30 days to October 20. The MCP project put the combined rate across its Tier 1 SDKs at close to half a billion a month in July 2026.

FigureWhat it measuresSource
47,267Active servers in the official MCP Registry, counting the latest version of each server onceMCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data)
231.9Mnpm downloads of the official TypeScript MCP SDK (@modelcontextprotocol/sdk) in September 2026, up from 31.3M in September 2025npm, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data)
260.8MPyPI downloads of the official Python MCP SDK (package mcp) in the 30 days to October 20, 2026, excluding mirrorspypistats, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data)
~500MMonthly downloads across MCP’s Tier 1 SDKs, as stated by the MCP project in July 2026 (“close to half-a-billion”)MCP project, Jul 28, 2026Official (MCP project or foundation)
10,000+Active public MCP servers, according to Anthropic in December 2025 (Anthropic’s latest published server count)Anthropic, Dec 9, 2025Official (company-reported)
995Connectors listed in the Claude marketplace directory, which Anthropic describes as built for MCP (75+ in December 2025)Claude, read Oct 21, 2026Official (company-reported)
38,336Public GitHub repositories tagged with the mcp-server topicGitHub, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data)
286Member organisations of the Agentic AI Foundation (AAIF), MCP’s home at the Linux Foundation, up from 49 named at launch in December 2025AAIF, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (count from source page)
45%Share of 100 senior technology leaders at large software companies whose organisation runs MCP servers in limited or broad production, December 2025Stacklok, Jan 2026 · surveyed Dec 2025Survey (vendor-run)
382CVE records in the US National Vulnerability Database whose description mentions “Model Context Protocol” or “MCP server”, to October 21, 2026NVD, read Oct 21, 2026Vulnerability record (NVD)

The Official MCP Registry in Numbers

The official registry opened in preview in September 2025 as a central index of publicly available servers. Publishers verify a namespace, either a GitHub account or a domain, and submit metadata; the registry points to packages on npm, PyPI and other hosts rather than storing code. The MCP project counted close to 2,000 entries in November 2025. On October 21, 2026 the registry held 166,511 version records for 47,879 server names, 47,267 of them active.

Growth has accelerated through 2026. Of the servers listed today, 1,204 were first published by the end of 2025, 9,599 by late May and 25,761 by the end of August, and 11,869 were added in September alone. Some publishers list servers in bulk: the ten largest publishing namespaces account for 16.6% of active servers, while 91% of the 29,387 publishers list a single server.

Most registry servers are now hosted services: 66% of active servers list a remote endpoint, almost all of them on Streamable HTTP. Servers distributed as packages to run locally mostly use npm and the stdio transport.

FigureWhat it measuresSource
Sep 8, 2025Launch of the official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io) in previewMCP project, Sep 8, 2025Official (MCP project or foundation)
~2,000Entries in the official MCP Registry in November 2025, according to the MCP project, which put growth at 407% on the batch onboarded at launchMCP project, Nov 25, 2025Official (MCP project or foundation)
1,204Server names in today’s registry whose first version was published by December 31, 2025 (3,072 version records); servers removed since are not countedMCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data)
9,599Server names in today’s registry whose first version was published by May 24, 2026 (28,803 version records)MCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data)
25,761Server names in today’s registry whose first version was published by August 31, 2026 (86,208 version records)MCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data)
11,869Server names first published to the registry in September 2026, the busiest month so farMCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data)
21,643Servers in an independent researcher’s full harvest of the official MCP Registry, August 2026 (72,606 version records)Kraishan, Sep 12, 2026Research study
166,511Version records in the official MCP Registry, counting every published version of every serverMCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data)
44%Share of registry server names with more than one published version (20,942 of 47,879)MCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data)
66%Share of active registry servers that list a hosted remote endpoint (30,986 servers)MCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data)
33%Share of active registry servers distributed only as a package to run locally, with no remote endpoint (15,785 servers)MCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data)
30,256Active registry servers offering a Streamable HTTP remote endpoint; 1,077 offer the deprecated SSE transport and 730 offer SSE onlyMCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data)
11,423Active registry servers with an npm package (PyPI 4,553, Docker/OCI image 1,177, MCP Bundle 1,344, NuGet 155)MCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data)
99%Share of active registry servers distributed as a package whose package uses the local stdio transport (17,724 of 17,987)MCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data)
61%Share of active registry servers published under a GitHub-verified namespace (io.github.*) rather than a verified domainMCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data)
29,387Publishing namespaces (a GitHub account or a domain) behind the active registry servers; 91% publish a single serverMCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data)
16.6%Share of active registry servers published by the 10 largest publishing namespaces (7,835 servers; the largest publishes 2,365)MCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data)
PreviewStatus of the official MCP Registry: still a preview release with general availability to follow; its v0.1 API freeze began on October 24, 2025MCP Registry, read Oct 21, 2026Official (MCP project or foundation)

SDK Downloads

Download counts are the most frequently updated adoption signal and the easiest to misread. npm and PyPI count downloads, not users: an automated build that reinstalls its dependencies on every run adds to the total each time. They are still a fair guide to trend. npm downloads of the TypeScript SDK rose from 102,851 in December 2024 to 38.5M in December 2025 and 231.9M in September 2026.

Anthropic’s figure of 97M+ monthly SDK downloads, from December 2025, is still widely quoted but predates most of that growth. In July 2026 the MCP project gave close to half a billion a month across its Tier 1 SDKs, with the TypeScript and Python SDKs each past 1 billion downloads in total.

FigureWhat it measuresSource
102,851npm downloads of @modelcontextprotocol/sdk in December 2024, the first full month after MCP’s launchnpm, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data)
38.5Mnpm downloads of @modelcontextprotocol/sdk in December 2025npm, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data)
97M+Monthly SDK downloads across Python and TypeScript, according to Anthropic in December 2025Anthropic, Dec 9, 2025Official (company-reported)
256.8Mnpm downloads of @modelcontextprotocol/sdk in the 30 days to October 18, 2026npm, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data)
329.8MPyPI downloads of the mcp package in August 2026, excluding mirrors (July 319.7M, September 230.1M)pypistats, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data)
1 billion+Cumulative downloads of each of the TypeScript and Python MCP SDKs, as stated by the MCP project in July 2026MCP project, Jul 28, 2026Official (MCP project or foundation)
57.7MPyPI downloads of FastMCP (package fastmcp), a widely used third-party Python framework for MCP servers, in the 30 days to October 20, 2026, excluding mirrorspypistats, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data)

GitHub Activity

GitHub topics give only a rough count of MCP projects, because owners choose whether to tag their repositories. The mcp-server topic covered 38,336 public repositories on October 21, 2026. Of the repositories created by the end of 2025, 6,965 carry the topic today.

Stars show where developer attention sits. The official reference-server repository has 91,449 and the Python SDK 24,633. Servers from large vendors draw similar interest: Microsoft’s Playwright MCP server, which lets an agent drive a web browser, has 38,472 stars and GitHub’s own MCP server 33,828.

FigureWhat it measuresSource
91,449GitHub stars on modelcontextprotocol/servers, the official reference-server repository (11,839 forks)GitHub, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data)
24,633GitHub stars on the official Python MCP SDK repository (13,633 on the TypeScript SDK)GitHub, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data)
7,391GitHub stars on the official MCP Registry repository (1,032 forks)GitHub, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data)
38,472GitHub stars on Microsoft’s Playwright MCP server for browser automationGitHub, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data)
33,828GitHub stars on GitHub’s official MCP server (5,202 forks)GitHub, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data)
39,302Public GitHub repositories tagged with the model-context-protocol topicGitHub, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data)
6,965Public GitHub repositories created on or before December 31, 2025 that carry the mcp-server topic todayGitHub, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data)
18,033Public GitHub repositories created on or before May 24, 2026 that carry the mcp-server topic todayGitHub, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data)

Client and Platform Support

OpenAI, Google and Microsoft all added MCP support during 2025. Anthropic launched the protocol in November 2024; the first announcements listed below from GitHub, Microsoft, OpenAI and Google date from April to June 2025, and in December 2025 Anthropic named ChatGPT, Cursor, Gemini, Microsoft Copilot and Visual Studio Code among the products that had adopted it.

2026 has been about scale rather than first support. Google offers more than 50 managed MCP servers for its cloud services, and the Claude marketplace lists 995 connectors, up from more than 75 in December 2025. For how MCP fits alongside agent-to-agent standards, see our AI agent protocol ecosystem map.

FigureWhat it measuresSource
Nov 25, 2024Anthropic introduces and open-sources MCP, with pre-built servers for Google Drive, Slack, GitHub, Git, Postgres and Puppeteer and local MCP support in Claude DesktopAnthropic, Nov 25, 2024Official (company-reported)
Apr 4, 2025GitHub releases its official open-source GitHub MCP Server in public preview, a Go rewrite of Anthropic’s reference serverGitHub, Apr 4, 2025Official (company-reported)
May 1, 2025Anthropic adds remote MCP servers to Claude (Integrations), launching with 10 servicesAnthropic, May 1, 2025Official (company-reported)
May 19, 2025Microsoft announces first-party MCP support across GitHub, Copilot Studio, Dynamics 365, Azure AI Foundry, Semantic Kernel and Windows 11, and joins the MCP Steering Committee with GitHubMicrosoft, May 19, 2025Official (company-reported)
May 21, 2025OpenAI adds remote MCP server support to its Responses API, at no extra charge beyond tokens, and joins the MCP steering committeeOpenAI, May 21, 2025Official (company-reported)
May 22, 2025Anthropic launches the MCP connector on its API, connecting Claude to remote MCP servers without client codeAnthropic, May 22, 2025Official (company-reported)
Jun 25, 2025Google launches the open-source Gemini CLI with built-in MCP supportGoogle, Jun 25, 2025Official (company-reported)
Jul 9, 2025MCP support becomes generally available in Visual Studio Code (version 1.102)Microsoft, Jul 9, 2025Official (company-reported)
Sep 16, 2025GitHub launches the GitHub MCP Registry, a curated directory of MCP servers backed by their GitHub repositoriesGitHub, Sep 16, 2025Official (company-reported)
800M+ChatGPT users OpenAI said developers could reach with apps built on its Apps SDK, released in October 2025 as an open standard built on MCPOpenAI, Oct 6, 2025Official (company-reported)
5 productsAI products Anthropic named in December 2025 as having adopted MCP: ChatGPT, Cursor, Gemini, Microsoft Copilot and Visual Studio CodeAnthropic, Dec 9, 2025Official (company-reported)
Dec 10, 2025Google announces fully managed, remote MCP servers for Google and Google Cloud services, starting with Google Maps, BigQuery, Compute Engine and Kubernetes EngineGoogle Cloud, Dec 10, 2025Official (company-reported)
50+Google-managed MCP servers generally available or in preview, announced at Google Cloud Next ’26 in April 2026Google Cloud, Apr 29, 2026Official (company-reported)

Governance and Community

Anthropic donated MCP to the Agentic AI Foundation (AAIF), a directed fund under the Linux Foundation, on December 9, 2025. The launch release named 49 members, including eight platinum members: Amazon Web Services, Anthropic, Block, Bloomberg, Cloudflare, Google, Microsoft and OpenAI. The foundation’s members page showed 286 organisations on October 21, 2026, and it now hosts six projects, among them the Agent2Agent (A2A) protocol.

The MCP project rates its official SDKs by tier. Six of the ten are Tier 1, which requires a 100% pass rate on the project’s conformance tests and fixes for critical bugs within seven days. For what that means when choosing an SDK, see our note on what Tier 1 means for an MCP SDK.

FigureWhat it measuresSource
Dec 9, 2025Anthropic donates MCP to the Agentic AI Foundation (AAIF), a directed fund under the Linux Foundation, alongside Block’s goose and OpenAI’s AGENTS.mdLinux Foundation, Dec 9, 2025Official (MCP project or foundation)
8AAIF platinum members at launch: Amazon Web Services, Anthropic, Block, Bloomberg, Cloudflare, Google, Microsoft and OpenAILinux Foundation, Dec 9, 2025Official (MCP project or foundation)
49AAIF members named in the December 2025 launch release (8 platinum, 18 gold, 23 silver)Linux Foundation, Dec 9, 2025Measured (count from source page)
8 / 47 / 187 / 44AAIF platinum, gold, silver and associate members shown on the foundation’s members page, October 21, 2026 (286 in total)AAIF, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (count from source page)
6Projects hosted by the AAIF: AGENTS.md, goose, Model Context Protocol, agentgateway, Agent2Agent (A2A) and Agent RouterAAIF, read Oct 21, 2026Official (MCP project or foundation)
58MCP maintainers supporting the 9 core and lead maintainers in the MCP steering group, November 2025MCP project, Nov 25, 2025Official (MCP project or foundation)
2,900+Contributors in the MCP contributor community on Discord, with 100+ new contributors joining every week, November 2025MCP project, Nov 25, 2025Official (MCP project or foundation)
6 of 10Official MCP SDKs rated Tier 1 (fully supported): TypeScript, Python, C#, Go, Rust and Ruby; Java is Tier 2 and Swift, PHP and Kotlin are Tier 3MCP project, read Oct 21, 2026Official (MCP project or foundation)
100%Conformance-test pass rate required of a Tier 1 MCP SDK (80% for Tier 2), with issues triaged within 2 business days and critical bugs fixed within 7 daysMCP project, read Oct 21, 2026Specification or project rule

Protocol Versions and Transports

The specification has had four revisions since the launch version of November 2024. The current one, 2026-07-28, removes the initialization handshake and protocol-level sessions, so any request can reach any server instance behind an ordinary load balancer, and it replaces server-initiated requests with Multi Round-Trip Requests. It also deprecates Roots, Sampling, Logging and Dynamic Client Registration, which keep working until at least July 2027 under a new twelve-month deprecation policy.

The standard transports are unchanged: stdio for local servers and Streamable HTTP for remote ones. HTTP+SSE has been deprecated since March 2025, yet 1,077 active registry servers still offer an SSE endpoint. For a migration checklist, see our guide to MCP’s stateless July 2026 release.

FigureWhat it measuresSource
2025-03-26Specification revision that added an OAuth 2.1 authorization framework and replaced the original HTTP+SSE transport with Streamable HTTPMCP specification, Mar 26, 2025Specification or project rule
2025-06-18Specification revision that added structured tool output and elicitation, and classified MCP servers as OAuth resource serversMCP specification, Jun 18, 2025Specification or project rule
2025-11-25Specification revision that added asynchronous operations, statelessness, server identity and official extensions, according to AnthropicAnthropic, Dec 9, 2025Official (company-reported)
2026-07-28Current MCP protocol version, a stateless revision that removes the initialization handshake and protocol-level sessionsMCP specification, read Oct 21, 2026Specification or project rule
4 featuresFeatures deprecated in 2026-07-28: Roots, Sampling, Logging and Dynamic Client Registration, each eligible for removal in the first revision on or after July 28, 2027MCP specification, read Oct 21, 2026Specification or project rule
12 monthsMinimum window before a deprecated MCP feature becomes eligible for removal, under the deprecation policy introduced with 2026-07-28MCP project, Jul 28, 2026Specification or project rule
2 transportsStandard transports in the current specification: stdio and Streamable HTTP (HTTP+SSE has been deprecated since 2025-03-26)MCP specification, read Oct 21, 2026Specification or project rule
4 SDKsSDKs supporting the 2026-07-28 specification on release day, all four then rated Tier 1: TypeScript, Python, Go and C# (the Rust SDK, then outside Tier 1, supported it in beta)MCP project, Jul 28, 2026Official (MCP project or foundation)
Jun 18, 2026The Enterprise-Managed Authorization extension (one sign-in for every MCP server an administrator approves) becomes stable, with Okta the first supported identity providerMCP project, Jun 18, 2026Official (MCP project or foundation)
5 areasPriority areas in MCP’s August 2026 roadmap: agentic messaging primitives, HTTP-native transports, agent identity and enterprise security, improved primitives, and SDK developer experienceMCP project, Aug 22, 2026Official (MCP project or foundation)

Enterprise Adoption: What the Survey Data Shows

Survey data on MCP use inside companies is thin. The most detailed public source is Stacklok’s survey of 300 senior technology leaders at large enterprises, run in December 2025 with 100 respondents each from software, financial services and retail, most of them based in the United States. Across all three industries, 41% said their organisation ran MCP servers in limited or broad production. Among software companies the figure was 45%, with 19% in broad production.

Security was the most-cited obstacle among software respondents (64%), ahead of cost (40%). Stacklok sells an MCP platform, and its samples are small and limited to large companies, so treat these figures as a benchmark for large software organisations rather than a market-wide adoption rate.

FigureWhat it measuresSource
41%Share of 300 senior technology leaders at large enterprises in software, financial services and retail (100 each, December 2025) whose organisation runs MCP servers in limited (29%) or broad (12%) productionStacklok, Jan 2026 · surveyed Dec 2025Survey (vendor-run)
26% / 19%Share of 100 senior technology leaders at large software companies (December 2025) whose organisation runs MCP servers in limited production / in broad production (45% combined)Stacklok, Jan 2026 · surveyed Dec 2025Survey (vendor-run)
30%Share of 100 senior technology leaders at large software companies (December 2025) whose organisation is piloting MCP servers (26% still planning or evaluating)Stacklok, Jan 2026 · surveyed Dec 2025Survey (vendor-run)
49%Share of 100 senior technology leaders at large software companies (December 2025) ranking MCP adoption a top-3 (10%) or top-5 (39%) technology priority; 32% across all three industriesStacklok, Jan 2026 · surveyed Dec 2025Survey (vendor-run)
64%Share of 100 senior technology leaders at large software companies (December 2025) citing security concerns and requirements as an obstacle to MCP adoption, the most-cited obstacleStacklok, Jan 2026 · surveyed Dec 2025Survey (vendor-run)
40%Share of 100 senior technology leaders at large software companies (December 2025) citing implementation or running costs as an obstacle (legacy integration 38%, lack of end-user training 37%, proving business value 36%)Stacklok, Jan 2026 · surveyed Dec 2025Survey (vendor-run)
68%Share of 100 senior technology leaders at large software companies (December 2025) naming test generation and coverage as an MCP use case (code review 67%, debugging production issues 56%)Stacklok, Jan 2026 · surveyed Dec 2025Survey (vendor-run)
80%Share of 100 senior technology leaders at large software companies (December 2025) naming software developers as primary users of MCP servers (data analysts and scientists 68%, knowledge workers 47%)Stacklok, Jan 2026 · surveyed Dec 2025Survey (vendor-run)
63%Share of 100 senior technology leaders at large software companies (December 2025) whose organisation connects version control systems to AI agents through MCP (issue tracking 54%, cloud platforms 53%)Stacklok, Jan 2026 · surveyed Dec 2025Survey (vendor-run)
67%Share of 100 senior technology leaders at large software companies (December 2025) applying role-based permissions to MCP use (audit logging and monitoring 60%, zero-trust access control 54%)Stacklok, Jan 2026 · surveyed Dec 2025Survey (vendor-run)
69%Share of 100 senior technology leaders at large software companies (December 2025) building or planning to build their MCP platform in-house on open-source components (59% across all three industries)Stacklok, Jan 2026 · surveyed Dec 2025Survey (vendor-run)

Security: Vulnerabilities and Research

Published vulnerabilities have grown with adoption. The National Vulnerability Database held 382 CVE records mentioning “Model Context Protocol” or “MCP server” on October 21, 2026, 324 of them published in 2026. They include flaws in the project’s own tools, such as remote code execution in the MCP Inspector (CVE-2025-49596), and in third-party servers such as Context7 (CVE-2026-75130).

Academic measurements use different samples and methods, so their percentages should not be compared directly. A static analysis of 1,899 open-source servers found tool poisoning in 5.5%; a 2026 study of 64,611 servers found that automated scanners flag most servers as risky but that fewer than half of sampled alerts held up on manual review. For a dated list of incidents, see our MCP security incident ledger.

FigureWhat it measuresSource
58 / 324MCP-related CVE records in the National Vulnerability Database published in 2025 / in 2026 to October 21 (description mentions “Model Context Protocol” or “MCP server”)NVD, read Oct 21, 2026Vulnerability record (NVD)
79MCP-related CVE records in the National Vulnerability Database rated Critical, out of 382 to October 21, 2026 (161 rated High), using each record’s CVSS 3.1 score, or its CVSS 4.0 score where it has no 3.1 scoreNVD, read Oct 21, 2026Vulnerability record (NVD)
9.4CVSS 4.0 score (Critical) of CVE-2025-49596: remote code execution in the official MCP Inspector before version 0.14.1NVD, Jun 13, 2025Vulnerability record (NVD)
9.6CVSS 3.1 score (Critical) of CVE-2025-6514: OS command injection in the mcp-remote package when connecting to untrusted MCP serversNVD, Jul 9, 2025Vulnerability record (NVD)
7.3CVSS 4.0 score (High) of CVE-2025-53110 and CVE-2025-53109: access to unintended files in the official Filesystem reference server before 0.6.4 / 2025.7.01NVD, Jul 2, 2025Vulnerability record (NVD)
9.0CVSS 3.1 score (Critical; 6.4 under CVSS 4.0) of CVE-2026-75130: prompt injection through the Context7 MCP server’s Custom AI Instructions feature, versions through 2.1.2NVD, Aug 18, 2026Vulnerability record (NVD)
5.5%Share of 1,899 open-source MCP servers showing MCP-specific tool poisoning in a static-analysis study (7.2% had general vulnerabilities; 66% had code smells)Hasan et al., Jun 16, 2025Research study
8,401Valid projects (8,060 servers, 341 clients) among 17,630 entries collected from six MCP marketplaces; more than half of listed projects were invalid or low-valueGuo et al., Sep 29, 2025Research study
833Vulnerable servers identified among 67,057 servers analysed across six public MCP registries (18 with suspicious tool descriptions)Li and Gao, Oct 18, 2025Research study
<50%Share of sampled security-scanner alerts confirmed as true positives on manual review, although scanners flagged 96.89% of MCP servers as risky (study of 64,611 unique servers)Chen et al., Jul 13, 2026Research study
9.57%Share of scanned servers from the official MCP Registry with unauthenticated network exposure, the most common finding; about 7.6% had a high-severity finding after correcting for scanner precision (August 2026 snapshot)Kraishan, Sep 12, 2026Research study
40.6%Share of multi-version servers in the official MCP Registry that changed what they advertise between versions without notice (51.1% changed at all; 4.2% moved their remote endpoint to a different host)Kraishan, Sep 12, 2026Research study
95%Share of commercial PaaS-hosted remote MCP servers enforcing gateway-level OAuth 2.1 with PKCE, in a sample of 179 remote endpointsSohail, Sep 16, 2026Research study

What It Means for Marketing Teams

There is no public count of marketing teams using MCP, and none of the sources checked for this page publishes deployment numbers for individual marketing MCP servers. What can be measured is supply. On October 21, 2026, 16 active servers in the official registry mentioned HubSpot, 128 mentioned Shopify and 93 mentioned Google Ads. These counts include community-built servers as well as official ones, so they show where developers are building, not which servers are safe to connect.

For marketing operations, a sensible starting point is read-only access to reporting, documentation and CRM data, with campaign launches, budget changes and CRM updates kept behind human approval. See our roundup of official ads MCP servers from Meta, Google and TikTok and our CRM automation services.

FigureWhat it measuresSource
16Active official-registry servers whose name, title or description mentions HubSpot (official and community servers alike)MCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data)
33Active official-registry servers whose name, title or description mentions Salesforce (official and community servers alike)MCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data)
93Active official-registry servers whose name, title or description mentions Google Ads (official and community servers alike)MCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data)
56Active official-registry servers whose name, title or description mentions Meta or Facebook ads (official and community servers alike)MCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data)
70Active official-registry servers whose name, title or description mentions Google Analytics or GA4 (official and community servers alike)MCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data)
128Active official-registry servers whose name, title or description mentions Shopify (official and community servers alike)MCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data)
74Active official-registry servers whose name, title or description mentions WordPress (official and community servers alike)MCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data)
7Active official-registry servers whose name, title or description mentions Klaviyo (official and community servers alike)MCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data)
7Active official-registry servers whose name, title or description mentions Mailchimp (official and community servers alike)MCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data)
251Active official-registry servers whose name, title or description mentions LinkedIn (official and community servers alike)MCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data)
62%Share of 100 senior technology leaders at large software companies (December 2025) whose organisation connects documentation systems such as Confluence, Notion or internal wikis to AI agents through MCP (Slack or Teams 37%)Stacklok, Jan 2026 · surveyed Dec 2025Survey (vendor-run)

Where MCP Goes Next

The MCP project’s August 2026 roadmap sets five priority areas for the next specification release and beyond, among them agent identity and enterprise-ready security; work on agentic messaging includes server-initiated events, so that clients are not left polling for results. The official registry is still in preview, with general availability planned but not dated.

Forecasts of MCP adoption are not measurements. Our six-month MCP adoption forecast and Q3 2026 projection set out scenarios; check any forecast figure against the measured counts on this page before relying on it.

Widely Quoted MCP Figures, Checked

Several MCP statistics circulate without a source, or with a source that says something different. Each one below is checked against the publisher’s own page or data.

Often quoted asWhat the source says
78% of enterprise AI teams run MCP in productionNone of the surveys or reports checked for this page gives this figure. Stacklok’s December 2025 survey of 300 enterprise technology leaders found 41% in limited or broad production across three industries, and 45% among software companies.
41% of software companies run MCP in production (29% limited, 12% broad)In Stacklok’s survey, 41% (29% plus 12%) is the figure for all 300 respondents across software, financial services and retail. For the 100 software companies it is 45%: 26% in limited and 19% in broad production.
There are 9,400+ public MCP serversNo primary source checked gives 9,400. The MCP project counted close to 2,000 entries in its official registry in November 2025, an independent census found 21,643 registry servers in August 2026, and the registry listed 47,267 active servers on October 21, 2026.
MCP SDKs are downloaded 97 million times a monthThis is Anthropic’s December 2025 figure. The MCP project put Tier 1 SDK downloads at close to half a billion a month in July 2026, and npm alone recorded 231.9M downloads of the TypeScript SDK in September 2026.
67% of MCP servers use stdio, 28% Streamable HTTP and 5% SSENo source checked gives this split. In the official registry on October 21, 2026, 66% of active servers listed a remote endpoint: 30,256 offered Streamable HTTP and 1,077 the deprecated SSE transport.
Sampling and roots are core MCP client featuresThey were until the 2026-07-28 specification, which deprecated Roots, Sampling and Logging. They still work until at least July 2027, but new implementations should not adopt them.
HubSpot’s MCP server has 720+ deployments and Salesforce’s 1,200+No source checked gives these figures. The official registry shows how many listed servers mention each product (16 for HubSpot, 33 for Salesforce), not how many teams use them.
Gartner says 80% of enterprise apps will embed AI agents by 2026Gartner’s August 2025 forecast is that 40% of enterprise applications will include task-specific AI agents by the end of 2026, up from less than 5% in 2025. It is a forecast, not a measurement.

Quote the Count, the Source and the Date

MCP adoption figures go out of date within weeks. When you quote one, carry its source and date with it: “the official MCP Registry listed 47,267 active servers on October 21, 2026” can be checked, while “MCP has 9,400 servers” cannot.

For decisions about your own stack, the counts matter less than the controls: which servers you connect, what they are allowed to do and who approves their actions.

Sources

Every figure on this page comes from one of the sources below.

MCP project, official registry and foundation
Company announcements and release notes
Package registries and code hosting (counts read Oct 21, 2026)
Vulnerability records and research papers
Surveys and forecasts

Build MCP Integrations You Can Audit

We design agent workflows around MCP servers with scoped permissions, approval gates and logging, so each new connection adds capability without adding unmanaged risk.

MCP server selection and security review
CRM, analytics and ad-platform integrations
Approval workflows and audit logging

Digital Applied newsletter

Deep dives on AI, marketing and development.

Practical guides and fresh insights by email. No recycled takes.

Related Articles

Continue exploring with these related guides