MCP Adoption Statistics 2026: Registry, SDK and CVE Data
MCP adoption statistics for 2026: official registry counts, npm and PyPI SDK downloads, platform support, enterprise survey results and NVD vulnerability data.
Active servers in the official MCP Registry, Oct 21, 2026
npm downloads of the TypeScript MCP SDK in Sept 2026 (31.3M a year earlier)
Large software firms running MCP in production (Stacklok survey, Dec 2025)
MCP-related CVE records in the NVD to Oct 21, 2026
Key Takeaways
How widely is the Model Context Protocol used in 2026? MCP, the open standard Anthropic released in November 2024 for connecting AI applications to tools and data, now has an official registry, official SDKs in ten languages and support from OpenAI, Google and Microsoft. Putting numbers on it is harder: server counts depend on which directory is counted, download figures move by tens of millions a month, and several widely shared statistics have no source at all.
This page collects MCP adoption figures that can be traced to their publisher: counts read on October 21, 2026 from the official MCP Registry, npm, PyPI, GitHub and the US National Vulnerability Database, the MCP project’s own announcements, company launch posts, Stacklok’s enterprise survey and security research published on arXiv. Every row names its source and period. For help applying MCP in your own stack, see our AI transformation work.
How to read this page: “Measured (public data)” is a count read on October 21, 2026 from a public API or listing: the official MCP Registry, npm, pypistats.org (PyPI’s public download data) or GitHub. These counts change daily. “Measured (count from source page)” is a count of the entries listed on a source page. “Official (MCP project or foundation)” is a figure or fact stated by the MCP project, the Linux Foundation or the Agentic AI Foundation, and “Official (company-reported)” a company’s own dated announcement. “Specification or project rule” is how the MCP specification or project rules define something. “Survey (vendor-run)” is Stacklok’s December 2025 survey; Stacklok sells MCP software. “Research study” is security research posted on arXiv. “Vulnerability record (NVD)” is a CVE record or count from the National Vulnerability Database. Every source is listed once in the Sources section at the end.
MCP Adoption at a Glance
No single number captures MCP adoption. The official MCP Registry is the closest thing to a census of public servers: on October 21, 2026 it listed 47,267 active servers. Anthropic’s figure of more than 10,000 active public servers dates from December 2025 and is its latest published count. Neither figure includes the private servers that companies run for internal use.
Downloads tell the same story. The official TypeScript SDK was downloaded 231.9M times from npm in September 2026, against 31.3M a year earlier, and the Python SDK 260.8M times from PyPI in the 30 days to October 20. The MCP project put the combined rate across its Tier 1 SDKs at close to half a billion a month in July 2026.
| Figure | What it measures | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 47,267 | Active servers in the official MCP Registry, counting the latest version of each server once | MCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data) |
| 231.9M | npm downloads of the official TypeScript MCP SDK (@modelcontextprotocol/sdk) in September 2026, up from 31.3M in September 2025 | npm, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data) |
| 260.8M | PyPI downloads of the official Python MCP SDK (package mcp) in the 30 days to October 20, 2026, excluding mirrors | pypistats, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data) |
| ~500M | Monthly downloads across MCP’s Tier 1 SDKs, as stated by the MCP project in July 2026 (“close to half-a-billion”) | MCP project, Jul 28, 2026Official (MCP project or foundation) |
| 10,000+ | Active public MCP servers, according to Anthropic in December 2025 (Anthropic’s latest published server count) | Anthropic, Dec 9, 2025Official (company-reported) |
| 995 | Connectors listed in the Claude marketplace directory, which Anthropic describes as built for MCP (75+ in December 2025) | Claude, read Oct 21, 2026Official (company-reported) |
| 38,336 | Public GitHub repositories tagged with the mcp-server topic | GitHub, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data) |
| 286 | Member organisations of the Agentic AI Foundation (AAIF), MCP’s home at the Linux Foundation, up from 49 named at launch in December 2025 | AAIF, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (count from source page) |
| 45% | Share of 100 senior technology leaders at large software companies whose organisation runs MCP servers in limited or broad production, December 2025 | Stacklok, Jan 2026 · surveyed Dec 2025Survey (vendor-run) |
| 382 | CVE records in the US National Vulnerability Database whose description mentions “Model Context Protocol” or “MCP server”, to October 21, 2026 | NVD, read Oct 21, 2026Vulnerability record (NVD) |
The Official MCP Registry in Numbers
The official registry opened in preview in September 2025 as a central index of publicly available servers. Publishers verify a namespace, either a GitHub account or a domain, and submit metadata; the registry points to packages on npm, PyPI and other hosts rather than storing code. The MCP project counted close to 2,000 entries in November 2025. On October 21, 2026 the registry held 166,511 version records for 47,879 server names, 47,267 of them active.
Growth has accelerated through 2026. Of the servers listed today, 1,204 were first published by the end of 2025, 9,599 by late May and 25,761 by the end of August, and 11,869 were added in September alone. Some publishers list servers in bulk: the ten largest publishing namespaces account for 16.6% of active servers, while 91% of the 29,387 publishers list a single server.
Most registry servers are now hosted services: 66% of active servers list a remote endpoint, almost all of them on Streamable HTTP. Servers distributed as packages to run locally mostly use npm and the stdio transport.
| Figure | What it measures | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2025 | Launch of the official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io) in preview | MCP project, Sep 8, 2025Official (MCP project or foundation) |
| ~2,000 | Entries in the official MCP Registry in November 2025, according to the MCP project, which put growth at 407% on the batch onboarded at launch | MCP project, Nov 25, 2025Official (MCP project or foundation) |
| 1,204 | Server names in today’s registry whose first version was published by December 31, 2025 (3,072 version records); servers removed since are not counted | MCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data) |
| 9,599 | Server names in today’s registry whose first version was published by May 24, 2026 (28,803 version records) | MCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data) |
| 25,761 | Server names in today’s registry whose first version was published by August 31, 2026 (86,208 version records) | MCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data) |
| 11,869 | Server names first published to the registry in September 2026, the busiest month so far | MCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data) |
| 21,643 | Servers in an independent researcher’s full harvest of the official MCP Registry, August 2026 (72,606 version records) | Kraishan, Sep 12, 2026Research study |
| 166,511 | Version records in the official MCP Registry, counting every published version of every server | MCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data) |
| 44% | Share of registry server names with more than one published version (20,942 of 47,879) | MCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data) |
| 66% | Share of active registry servers that list a hosted remote endpoint (30,986 servers) | MCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data) |
| 33% | Share of active registry servers distributed only as a package to run locally, with no remote endpoint (15,785 servers) | MCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data) |
| 30,256 | Active registry servers offering a Streamable HTTP remote endpoint; 1,077 offer the deprecated SSE transport and 730 offer SSE only | MCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data) |
| 11,423 | Active registry servers with an npm package (PyPI 4,553, Docker/OCI image 1,177, MCP Bundle 1,344, NuGet 155) | MCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data) |
| 99% | Share of active registry servers distributed as a package whose package uses the local stdio transport (17,724 of 17,987) | MCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data) |
| 61% | Share of active registry servers published under a GitHub-verified namespace (io.github.*) rather than a verified domain | MCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data) |
| 29,387 | Publishing namespaces (a GitHub account or a domain) behind the active registry servers; 91% publish a single server | MCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data) |
| 16.6% | Share of active registry servers published by the 10 largest publishing namespaces (7,835 servers; the largest publishes 2,365) | MCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data) |
| Preview | Status of the official MCP Registry: still a preview release with general availability to follow; its v0.1 API freeze began on October 24, 2025 | MCP Registry, read Oct 21, 2026Official (MCP project or foundation) |
SDK Downloads
Download counts are the most frequently updated adoption signal and the easiest to misread. npm and PyPI count downloads, not users: an automated build that reinstalls its dependencies on every run adds to the total each time. They are still a fair guide to trend. npm downloads of the TypeScript SDK rose from 102,851 in December 2024 to 38.5M in December 2025 and 231.9M in September 2026.
Anthropic’s figure of 97M+ monthly SDK downloads, from December 2025, is still widely quoted but predates most of that growth. In July 2026 the MCP project gave close to half a billion a month across its Tier 1 SDKs, with the TypeScript and Python SDKs each past 1 billion downloads in total.
| Figure | What it measures | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 102,851 | npm downloads of @modelcontextprotocol/sdk in December 2024, the first full month after MCP’s launch | npm, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data) |
| 38.5M | npm downloads of @modelcontextprotocol/sdk in December 2025 | npm, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data) |
| 97M+ | Monthly SDK downloads across Python and TypeScript, according to Anthropic in December 2025 | Anthropic, Dec 9, 2025Official (company-reported) |
| 256.8M | npm downloads of @modelcontextprotocol/sdk in the 30 days to October 18, 2026 | npm, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data) |
| 329.8M | PyPI downloads of the mcp package in August 2026, excluding mirrors (July 319.7M, September 230.1M) | pypistats, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data) |
| 1 billion+ | Cumulative downloads of each of the TypeScript and Python MCP SDKs, as stated by the MCP project in July 2026 | MCP project, Jul 28, 2026Official (MCP project or foundation) |
| 57.7M | PyPI downloads of FastMCP (package fastmcp), a widely used third-party Python framework for MCP servers, in the 30 days to October 20, 2026, excluding mirrors | pypistats, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data) |
GitHub Activity
GitHub topics give only a rough count of MCP projects, because owners choose whether to tag their repositories. The mcp-server topic covered 38,336 public repositories on October 21, 2026. Of the repositories created by the end of 2025, 6,965 carry the topic today.
Stars show where developer attention sits. The official reference-server repository has 91,449 and the Python SDK 24,633. Servers from large vendors draw similar interest: Microsoft’s Playwright MCP server, which lets an agent drive a web browser, has 38,472 stars and GitHub’s own MCP server 33,828.
| Figure | What it measures | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 91,449 | GitHub stars on modelcontextprotocol/servers, the official reference-server repository (11,839 forks) | GitHub, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data) |
| 24,633 | GitHub stars on the official Python MCP SDK repository (13,633 on the TypeScript SDK) | GitHub, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data) |
| 7,391 | GitHub stars on the official MCP Registry repository (1,032 forks) | GitHub, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data) |
| 38,472 | GitHub stars on Microsoft’s Playwright MCP server for browser automation | GitHub, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data) |
| 33,828 | GitHub stars on GitHub’s official MCP server (5,202 forks) | GitHub, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data) |
| 39,302 | Public GitHub repositories tagged with the model-context-protocol topic | GitHub, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data) |
| 6,965 | Public GitHub repositories created on or before December 31, 2025 that carry the mcp-server topic today | GitHub, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data) |
| 18,033 | Public GitHub repositories created on or before May 24, 2026 that carry the mcp-server topic today | GitHub, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data) |
Client and Platform Support
OpenAI, Google and Microsoft all added MCP support during 2025. Anthropic launched the protocol in November 2024; the first announcements listed below from GitHub, Microsoft, OpenAI and Google date from April to June 2025, and in December 2025 Anthropic named ChatGPT, Cursor, Gemini, Microsoft Copilot and Visual Studio Code among the products that had adopted it.
2026 has been about scale rather than first support. Google offers more than 50 managed MCP servers for its cloud services, and the Claude marketplace lists 995 connectors, up from more than 75 in December 2025. For how MCP fits alongside agent-to-agent standards, see our AI agent protocol ecosystem map.
| Figure | What it measures | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2024 | Anthropic introduces and open-sources MCP, with pre-built servers for Google Drive, Slack, GitHub, Git, Postgres and Puppeteer and local MCP support in Claude Desktop | Anthropic, Nov 25, 2024Official (company-reported) |
| Apr 4, 2025 | GitHub releases its official open-source GitHub MCP Server in public preview, a Go rewrite of Anthropic’s reference server | GitHub, Apr 4, 2025Official (company-reported) |
| May 1, 2025 | Anthropic adds remote MCP servers to Claude (Integrations), launching with 10 services | Anthropic, May 1, 2025Official (company-reported) |
| May 19, 2025 | Microsoft announces first-party MCP support across GitHub, Copilot Studio, Dynamics 365, Azure AI Foundry, Semantic Kernel and Windows 11, and joins the MCP Steering Committee with GitHub | Microsoft, May 19, 2025Official (company-reported) |
| May 21, 2025 | OpenAI adds remote MCP server support to its Responses API, at no extra charge beyond tokens, and joins the MCP steering committee | OpenAI, May 21, 2025Official (company-reported) |
| May 22, 2025 | Anthropic launches the MCP connector on its API, connecting Claude to remote MCP servers without client code | Anthropic, May 22, 2025Official (company-reported) |
| Jun 25, 2025 | Google launches the open-source Gemini CLI with built-in MCP support | Google, Jun 25, 2025Official (company-reported) |
| Jul 9, 2025 | MCP support becomes generally available in Visual Studio Code (version 1.102) | Microsoft, Jul 9, 2025Official (company-reported) |
| Sep 16, 2025 | GitHub launches the GitHub MCP Registry, a curated directory of MCP servers backed by their GitHub repositories | GitHub, Sep 16, 2025Official (company-reported) |
| 800M+ | ChatGPT users OpenAI said developers could reach with apps built on its Apps SDK, released in October 2025 as an open standard built on MCP | OpenAI, Oct 6, 2025Official (company-reported) |
| 5 products | AI products Anthropic named in December 2025 as having adopted MCP: ChatGPT, Cursor, Gemini, Microsoft Copilot and Visual Studio Code | Anthropic, Dec 9, 2025Official (company-reported) |
| Dec 10, 2025 | Google announces fully managed, remote MCP servers for Google and Google Cloud services, starting with Google Maps, BigQuery, Compute Engine and Kubernetes Engine | Google Cloud, Dec 10, 2025Official (company-reported) |
| 50+ | Google-managed MCP servers generally available or in preview, announced at Google Cloud Next ’26 in April 2026 | Google Cloud, Apr 29, 2026Official (company-reported) |
Governance and Community
Anthropic donated MCP to the Agentic AI Foundation (AAIF), a directed fund under the Linux Foundation, on December 9, 2025. The launch release named 49 members, including eight platinum members: Amazon Web Services, Anthropic, Block, Bloomberg, Cloudflare, Google, Microsoft and OpenAI. The foundation’s members page showed 286 organisations on October 21, 2026, and it now hosts six projects, among them the Agent2Agent (A2A) protocol.
The MCP project rates its official SDKs by tier. Six of the ten are Tier 1, which requires a 100% pass rate on the project’s conformance tests and fixes for critical bugs within seven days. For what that means when choosing an SDK, see our note on what Tier 1 means for an MCP SDK.
| Figure | What it measures | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2025 | Anthropic donates MCP to the Agentic AI Foundation (AAIF), a directed fund under the Linux Foundation, alongside Block’s goose and OpenAI’s AGENTS.md | Linux Foundation, Dec 9, 2025Official (MCP project or foundation) |
| 8 | AAIF platinum members at launch: Amazon Web Services, Anthropic, Block, Bloomberg, Cloudflare, Google, Microsoft and OpenAI | Linux Foundation, Dec 9, 2025Official (MCP project or foundation) |
| 49 | AAIF members named in the December 2025 launch release (8 platinum, 18 gold, 23 silver) | Linux Foundation, Dec 9, 2025Measured (count from source page) |
| 8 / 47 / 187 / 44 | AAIF platinum, gold, silver and associate members shown on the foundation’s members page, October 21, 2026 (286 in total) | AAIF, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (count from source page) |
| 6 | Projects hosted by the AAIF: AGENTS.md, goose, Model Context Protocol, agentgateway, Agent2Agent (A2A) and Agent Router | AAIF, read Oct 21, 2026Official (MCP project or foundation) |
| 58 | MCP maintainers supporting the 9 core and lead maintainers in the MCP steering group, November 2025 | MCP project, Nov 25, 2025Official (MCP project or foundation) |
| 2,900+ | Contributors in the MCP contributor community on Discord, with 100+ new contributors joining every week, November 2025 | MCP project, Nov 25, 2025Official (MCP project or foundation) |
| 6 of 10 | Official MCP SDKs rated Tier 1 (fully supported): TypeScript, Python, C#, Go, Rust and Ruby; Java is Tier 2 and Swift, PHP and Kotlin are Tier 3 | MCP project, read Oct 21, 2026Official (MCP project or foundation) |
| 100% | Conformance-test pass rate required of a Tier 1 MCP SDK (80% for Tier 2), with issues triaged within 2 business days and critical bugs fixed within 7 days | MCP project, read Oct 21, 2026Specification or project rule |
Protocol Versions and Transports
The specification has had four revisions since the launch version of November 2024. The current one, 2026-07-28, removes the initialization handshake and protocol-level sessions, so any request can reach any server instance behind an ordinary load balancer, and it replaces server-initiated requests with Multi Round-Trip Requests. It also deprecates Roots, Sampling, Logging and Dynamic Client Registration, which keep working until at least July 2027 under a new twelve-month deprecation policy.
The standard transports are unchanged: stdio for local servers and Streamable HTTP for remote ones. HTTP+SSE has been deprecated since March 2025, yet 1,077 active registry servers still offer an SSE endpoint. For a migration checklist, see our guide to MCP’s stateless July 2026 release.
| Figure | What it measures | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-26 | Specification revision that added an OAuth 2.1 authorization framework and replaced the original HTTP+SSE transport with Streamable HTTP | MCP specification, Mar 26, 2025Specification or project rule |
| 2025-06-18 | Specification revision that added structured tool output and elicitation, and classified MCP servers as OAuth resource servers | MCP specification, Jun 18, 2025Specification or project rule |
| 2025-11-25 | Specification revision that added asynchronous operations, statelessness, server identity and official extensions, according to Anthropic | Anthropic, Dec 9, 2025Official (company-reported) |
| 2026-07-28 | Current MCP protocol version, a stateless revision that removes the initialization handshake and protocol-level sessions | MCP specification, read Oct 21, 2026Specification or project rule |
| 4 features | Features deprecated in 2026-07-28: Roots, Sampling, Logging and Dynamic Client Registration, each eligible for removal in the first revision on or after July 28, 2027 | MCP specification, read Oct 21, 2026Specification or project rule |
| 12 months | Minimum window before a deprecated MCP feature becomes eligible for removal, under the deprecation policy introduced with 2026-07-28 | MCP project, Jul 28, 2026Specification or project rule |
| 2 transports | Standard transports in the current specification: stdio and Streamable HTTP (HTTP+SSE has been deprecated since 2025-03-26) | MCP specification, read Oct 21, 2026Specification or project rule |
| 4 SDKs | SDKs supporting the 2026-07-28 specification on release day, all four then rated Tier 1: TypeScript, Python, Go and C# (the Rust SDK, then outside Tier 1, supported it in beta) | MCP project, Jul 28, 2026Official (MCP project or foundation) |
| Jun 18, 2026 | The Enterprise-Managed Authorization extension (one sign-in for every MCP server an administrator approves) becomes stable, with Okta the first supported identity provider | MCP project, Jun 18, 2026Official (MCP project or foundation) |
| 5 areas | Priority areas in MCP’s August 2026 roadmap: agentic messaging primitives, HTTP-native transports, agent identity and enterprise security, improved primitives, and SDK developer experience | MCP project, Aug 22, 2026Official (MCP project or foundation) |
Enterprise Adoption: What the Survey Data Shows
Survey data on MCP use inside companies is thin. The most detailed public source is Stacklok’s survey of 300 senior technology leaders at large enterprises, run in December 2025 with 100 respondents each from software, financial services and retail, most of them based in the United States. Across all three industries, 41% said their organisation ran MCP servers in limited or broad production. Among software companies the figure was 45%, with 19% in broad production.
Security was the most-cited obstacle among software respondents (64%), ahead of cost (40%). Stacklok sells an MCP platform, and its samples are small and limited to large companies, so treat these figures as a benchmark for large software organisations rather than a market-wide adoption rate.
| Figure | What it measures | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Share of 300 senior technology leaders at large enterprises in software, financial services and retail (100 each, December 2025) whose organisation runs MCP servers in limited (29%) or broad (12%) production | Stacklok, Jan 2026 · surveyed Dec 2025Survey (vendor-run) |
| 26% / 19% | Share of 100 senior technology leaders at large software companies (December 2025) whose organisation runs MCP servers in limited production / in broad production (45% combined) | Stacklok, Jan 2026 · surveyed Dec 2025Survey (vendor-run) |
| 30% | Share of 100 senior technology leaders at large software companies (December 2025) whose organisation is piloting MCP servers (26% still planning or evaluating) | Stacklok, Jan 2026 · surveyed Dec 2025Survey (vendor-run) |
| 49% | Share of 100 senior technology leaders at large software companies (December 2025) ranking MCP adoption a top-3 (10%) or top-5 (39%) technology priority; 32% across all three industries | Stacklok, Jan 2026 · surveyed Dec 2025Survey (vendor-run) |
| 64% | Share of 100 senior technology leaders at large software companies (December 2025) citing security concerns and requirements as an obstacle to MCP adoption, the most-cited obstacle | Stacklok, Jan 2026 · surveyed Dec 2025Survey (vendor-run) |
| 40% | Share of 100 senior technology leaders at large software companies (December 2025) citing implementation or running costs as an obstacle (legacy integration 38%, lack of end-user training 37%, proving business value 36%) | Stacklok, Jan 2026 · surveyed Dec 2025Survey (vendor-run) |
| 68% | Share of 100 senior technology leaders at large software companies (December 2025) naming test generation and coverage as an MCP use case (code review 67%, debugging production issues 56%) | Stacklok, Jan 2026 · surveyed Dec 2025Survey (vendor-run) |
| 80% | Share of 100 senior technology leaders at large software companies (December 2025) naming software developers as primary users of MCP servers (data analysts and scientists 68%, knowledge workers 47%) | Stacklok, Jan 2026 · surveyed Dec 2025Survey (vendor-run) |
| 63% | Share of 100 senior technology leaders at large software companies (December 2025) whose organisation connects version control systems to AI agents through MCP (issue tracking 54%, cloud platforms 53%) | Stacklok, Jan 2026 · surveyed Dec 2025Survey (vendor-run) |
| 67% | Share of 100 senior technology leaders at large software companies (December 2025) applying role-based permissions to MCP use (audit logging and monitoring 60%, zero-trust access control 54%) | Stacklok, Jan 2026 · surveyed Dec 2025Survey (vendor-run) |
| 69% | Share of 100 senior technology leaders at large software companies (December 2025) building or planning to build their MCP platform in-house on open-source components (59% across all three industries) | Stacklok, Jan 2026 · surveyed Dec 2025Survey (vendor-run) |
Security: Vulnerabilities and Research
Published vulnerabilities have grown with adoption. The National Vulnerability Database held 382 CVE records mentioning “Model Context Protocol” or “MCP server” on October 21, 2026, 324 of them published in 2026. They include flaws in the project’s own tools, such as remote code execution in the MCP Inspector (CVE-2025-49596), and in third-party servers such as Context7 (CVE-2026-75130).
Academic measurements use different samples and methods, so their percentages should not be compared directly. A static analysis of 1,899 open-source servers found tool poisoning in 5.5%; a 2026 study of 64,611 servers found that automated scanners flag most servers as risky but that fewer than half of sampled alerts held up on manual review. For a dated list of incidents, see our MCP security incident ledger.
| Figure | What it measures | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 58 / 324 | MCP-related CVE records in the National Vulnerability Database published in 2025 / in 2026 to October 21 (description mentions “Model Context Protocol” or “MCP server”) | NVD, read Oct 21, 2026Vulnerability record (NVD) |
| 79 | MCP-related CVE records in the National Vulnerability Database rated Critical, out of 382 to October 21, 2026 (161 rated High), using each record’s CVSS 3.1 score, or its CVSS 4.0 score where it has no 3.1 score | NVD, read Oct 21, 2026Vulnerability record (NVD) |
| 9.4 | CVSS 4.0 score (Critical) of CVE-2025-49596: remote code execution in the official MCP Inspector before version 0.14.1 | NVD, Jun 13, 2025Vulnerability record (NVD) |
| 9.6 | CVSS 3.1 score (Critical) of CVE-2025-6514: OS command injection in the mcp-remote package when connecting to untrusted MCP servers | NVD, Jul 9, 2025Vulnerability record (NVD) |
| 7.3 | CVSS 4.0 score (High) of CVE-2025-53110 and CVE-2025-53109: access to unintended files in the official Filesystem reference server before 0.6.4 / 2025.7.01 | NVD, Jul 2, 2025Vulnerability record (NVD) |
| 9.0 | CVSS 3.1 score (Critical; 6.4 under CVSS 4.0) of CVE-2026-75130: prompt injection through the Context7 MCP server’s Custom AI Instructions feature, versions through 2.1.2 | NVD, Aug 18, 2026Vulnerability record (NVD) |
| 5.5% | Share of 1,899 open-source MCP servers showing MCP-specific tool poisoning in a static-analysis study (7.2% had general vulnerabilities; 66% had code smells) | Hasan et al., Jun 16, 2025Research study |
| 8,401 | Valid projects (8,060 servers, 341 clients) among 17,630 entries collected from six MCP marketplaces; more than half of listed projects were invalid or low-value | Guo et al., Sep 29, 2025Research study |
| 833 | Vulnerable servers identified among 67,057 servers analysed across six public MCP registries (18 with suspicious tool descriptions) | Li and Gao, Oct 18, 2025Research study |
| <50% | Share of sampled security-scanner alerts confirmed as true positives on manual review, although scanners flagged 96.89% of MCP servers as risky (study of 64,611 unique servers) | Chen et al., Jul 13, 2026Research study |
| 9.57% | Share of scanned servers from the official MCP Registry with unauthenticated network exposure, the most common finding; about 7.6% had a high-severity finding after correcting for scanner precision (August 2026 snapshot) | Kraishan, Sep 12, 2026Research study |
| 40.6% | Share of multi-version servers in the official MCP Registry that changed what they advertise between versions without notice (51.1% changed at all; 4.2% moved their remote endpoint to a different host) | Kraishan, Sep 12, 2026Research study |
| 95% | Share of commercial PaaS-hosted remote MCP servers enforcing gateway-level OAuth 2.1 with PKCE, in a sample of 179 remote endpoints | Sohail, Sep 16, 2026Research study |
What It Means for Marketing Teams
There is no public count of marketing teams using MCP, and none of the sources checked for this page publishes deployment numbers for individual marketing MCP servers. What can be measured is supply. On October 21, 2026, 16 active servers in the official registry mentioned HubSpot, 128 mentioned Shopify and 93 mentioned Google Ads. These counts include community-built servers as well as official ones, so they show where developers are building, not which servers are safe to connect.
For marketing operations, a sensible starting point is read-only access to reporting, documentation and CRM data, with campaign launches, budget changes and CRM updates kept behind human approval. See our roundup of official ads MCP servers from Meta, Google and TikTok and our CRM automation services.
| Figure | What it measures | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Active official-registry servers whose name, title or description mentions HubSpot (official and community servers alike) | MCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data) |
| 33 | Active official-registry servers whose name, title or description mentions Salesforce (official and community servers alike) | MCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data) |
| 93 | Active official-registry servers whose name, title or description mentions Google Ads (official and community servers alike) | MCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data) |
| 56 | Active official-registry servers whose name, title or description mentions Meta or Facebook ads (official and community servers alike) | MCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data) |
| 70 | Active official-registry servers whose name, title or description mentions Google Analytics or GA4 (official and community servers alike) | MCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data) |
| 128 | Active official-registry servers whose name, title or description mentions Shopify (official and community servers alike) | MCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data) |
| 74 | Active official-registry servers whose name, title or description mentions WordPress (official and community servers alike) | MCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data) |
| 7 | Active official-registry servers whose name, title or description mentions Klaviyo (official and community servers alike) | MCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data) |
| 7 | Active official-registry servers whose name, title or description mentions Mailchimp (official and community servers alike) | MCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data) |
| 251 | Active official-registry servers whose name, title or description mentions LinkedIn (official and community servers alike) | MCP Registry API, read Oct 21, 2026Measured (public data) |
| 62% | Share of 100 senior technology leaders at large software companies (December 2025) whose organisation connects documentation systems such as Confluence, Notion or internal wikis to AI agents through MCP (Slack or Teams 37%) | Stacklok, Jan 2026 · surveyed Dec 2025Survey (vendor-run) |
Where MCP Goes Next
The MCP project’s August 2026 roadmap sets five priority areas for the next specification release and beyond, among them agent identity and enterprise-ready security; work on agentic messaging includes server-initiated events, so that clients are not left polling for results. The official registry is still in preview, with general availability planned but not dated.
Forecasts of MCP adoption are not measurements. Our six-month MCP adoption forecast and Q3 2026 projection set out scenarios; check any forecast figure against the measured counts on this page before relying on it.
Widely Quoted MCP Figures, Checked
Several MCP statistics circulate without a source, or with a source that says something different. Each one below is checked against the publisher’s own page or data.
| Often quoted as | What the source says |
|---|---|
| 78% of enterprise AI teams run MCP in production | None of the surveys or reports checked for this page gives this figure. Stacklok’s December 2025 survey of 300 enterprise technology leaders found 41% in limited or broad production across three industries, and 45% among software companies. |
| 41% of software companies run MCP in production (29% limited, 12% broad) | In Stacklok’s survey, 41% (29% plus 12%) is the figure for all 300 respondents across software, financial services and retail. For the 100 software companies it is 45%: 26% in limited and 19% in broad production. |
| There are 9,400+ public MCP servers | No primary source checked gives 9,400. The MCP project counted close to 2,000 entries in its official registry in November 2025, an independent census found 21,643 registry servers in August 2026, and the registry listed 47,267 active servers on October 21, 2026. |
| MCP SDKs are downloaded 97 million times a month | This is Anthropic’s December 2025 figure. The MCP project put Tier 1 SDK downloads at close to half a billion a month in July 2026, and npm alone recorded 231.9M downloads of the TypeScript SDK in September 2026. |
| 67% of MCP servers use stdio, 28% Streamable HTTP and 5% SSE | No source checked gives this split. In the official registry on October 21, 2026, 66% of active servers listed a remote endpoint: 30,256 offered Streamable HTTP and 1,077 the deprecated SSE transport. |
| Sampling and roots are core MCP client features | They were until the 2026-07-28 specification, which deprecated Roots, Sampling and Logging. They still work until at least July 2027, but new implementations should not adopt them. |
| HubSpot’s MCP server has 720+ deployments and Salesforce’s 1,200+ | No source checked gives these figures. The official registry shows how many listed servers mention each product (16 for HubSpot, 33 for Salesforce), not how many teams use them. |
| Gartner says 80% of enterprise apps will embed AI agents by 2026 | Gartner’s August 2025 forecast is that 40% of enterprise applications will include task-specific AI agents by the end of 2026, up from less than 5% in 2025. It is a forecast, not a measurement. |
Quote the Count, the Source and the Date
MCP adoption figures go out of date within weeks. When you quote one, carry its source and date with it: “the official MCP Registry listed 47,267 active servers on October 21, 2026” can be checked, while “MCP has 9,400 servers” cannot.
For decisions about your own stack, the counts matter less than the controls: which servers you connect, what they are allowed to do and who approves their actions.
Sources
Every figure on this page comes from one of the sources below.
- Model Context Protocol (MCP Blog)The 2026-07-28 SpecificationJul 28, 2026
- Model Context Protocol (MCP Blog)One Year of MCP: November 2025 Spec ReleaseNov 25, 2025
- Model Context Protocol (MCP Blog)Introducing the MCP RegistrySep 8, 2025
- Model Context Protocol (MCP Blog)The New MCP RoadmapAug 22, 2026
- Model Context Protocol (MCP Blog)Enterprise-Managed Authorization: Zero-touch OAuth for MCPJun 18, 2026
- Model Context ProtocolVersioningread Oct 21, 2026
- Model Context ProtocolDeprecated features (specification 2026-07-28)read Oct 21, 2026
- Model Context ProtocolTransports (specification 2026-07-28)read Oct 21, 2026
- Model Context ProtocolKey Changes, specification 2025-03-26Mar 26, 2025
- Model Context ProtocolKey Changes, specification 2025-06-18Jun 18, 2025
- Model Context ProtocolSDKsread Oct 21, 2026
- Model Context ProtocolSDK Tiering Systemread Oct 21, 2026
- Model Context Protocol (official MCP Registry)Registry API, /v0/servers, full paginationread Oct 21, 2026
- Model Context Protocol (official MCP Registry)modelcontextprotocol/registry READMEread Oct 21, 2026
- Linux FoundationLinux Foundation Announces the Formation of the Agentic AI Foundation (AAIF), Anchored by New Project Contributions Including Model Context Protocol (MCP), goose and AGENTS.mdDec 9, 2025
- Agentic AI FoundationMembersread Oct 21, 2026
- Agentic AI FoundationProjects (home page)read Oct 21, 2026
- AnthropicIntroducing the Model Context ProtocolNov 25, 2024
- AnthropicClaude can now connect to your worldMay 1, 2025
- AnthropicNew capabilities for building agents on the Anthropic APIMay 22, 2025
- AnthropicDonating the Model Context Protocol and establishing the Agentic AI FoundationDec 9, 2025
- OpenAINew tools and features in the Responses APIMay 21, 2025
- OpenAIIntroducing apps in ChatGPT and the new Apps SDKOct 6, 2025
- MicrosoftMicrosoft Build 2025: The age of AI agents and building the open agentic webMay 19, 2025
- Microsoft (Visual Studio Code)June 2025 (version 1.102) release notesJul 9, 2025
- GitHubgithub-mcp-server is now available in public previewApr 4, 2025
- GitHubMeet the GitHub MCP Registry: The fastest way to discover MCP ServersSep 16, 2025
- GoogleGemini CLI: your open-source AI agentJun 25, 2025
- Google CloudAnnouncing Model Context Protocol (MCP) support for Google servicesDec 10, 2025
- Google Cloud50+ fully managed MCP servers now available for Google Cloud servicesApr 29, 2026
- Anthropic (Claude)Connectors and plugins, Claude Marketplaceread Oct 21, 2026
- npmRegistry download counts API: @modelcontextprotocol/sdkread Oct 21, 2026
- pypistats.org (PyPI public BigQuery data)Download statistics for the mcp and fastmcp packagesread Oct 21, 2026
- GitHubREST API: repository statistics and topic searchread Oct 21, 2026
- NIST National Vulnerability DatabaseCVE API 2.0, keyword searches for “Model Context Protocol” and “MCP server”read Oct 21, 2026
- NIST National Vulnerability DatabaseCVE-2025-49596 (MCP Inspector)Jun 13, 2025
- NIST National Vulnerability DatabaseCVE-2025-6514 (mcp-remote)Jul 9, 2025
- NIST National Vulnerability DatabaseCVE-2025-53110 and CVE-2025-53109 (Filesystem server)Jul 2, 2025
- NIST National Vulnerability DatabaseCVE-2026-75130 (Context7 MCP server)Aug 18, 2026
- Hasan, Li, Fallahzadeh, Rajbahadur, Adams and Hassan (arXiv)Model Context Protocol (MCP) at First Glance: Studying the Security and Maintainability of MCP ServersJun 16, 2025
- Guo, Hao, Zhang, Xu, Lv, Chen and Cheng (arXiv)A Measurement Study of Model Context Protocol EcosystemSep 29, 2025
- Li and Gao (arXiv)A First Look at the Security Issues in the Model Context Protocol EcosystemOct 18, 2025
- Chen, An, Wu, Wan, Hong, Chen, Pan, Dai and Yang (arXiv)Rethinking MCP Security: A Large-Scale Study of Runtime MCP Servers and Security Scanner ReliabilityJul 13, 2026
- Obada Kraishan (arXiv)Same Name, Different Server: A Security Census of Silent Drift in the Model Context Protocol EcosystemSep 12, 2026
- Muhammad Abdullah Sohail (arXiv)Characterizing Network Centralization and Observability in the Remote MCP EcosystemSep 16, 2026
- StacklokState of Model Context Protocol in Software 2026Jan 2026 · surveyed Dec 2025
- GartnerGartner Predicts 40% of Enterprise Apps Will Feature Task-Specific AI Agents by 2026, Up from Less Than 5% in 2025Aug 26, 2025
Build MCP Integrations You Can Audit
We design agent workflows around MCP servers with scoped permissions, approval gates and logging, so each new connection adds capability without adding unmanaged risk.
Deep dives on AI, marketing and development.
Practical guides and fresh insights by email. No recycled takes.
Related Articles
Continue exploring with these related guides